An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet
from what I have seen, his posts have been relevant and non-disruptive.
Your examples of what you call trolling seem to be more instances that anger you because you disagree. Aisha's age is disputed throughout the Muslim world. Just because he accused someone of lying doesn't make him a troll either. From what I've seen he recieves a lot more hostility than he dishes out. I've seen trolls. They try to spoil conversation instead of engaging in them. Also he has never denied the holocaust. Why do consistantly distort his position? Are you trying to provoke an emotional response?
Lets see your own definition.
BMZ is a holocaust denier ( Ask Zaephon , Rashna or any other COEM member) This is called making controversial statements.
2) HE does post Inflammatory content. Check his posts regarding FFI and Ali Sina's views regarding islam.He may personally disagree with any of the members but he has no point when he calls FFI as a spreading false information And ALi Sina a liar and a bastard.
Check my first debate. WHen I had already proved that ARsh and kursi in quran are literal he was still saying that in arabic Arsh may be a metaphorical. DOes it matter IF ARsh can be used in metaphorical way in Arabic when quran used it literally? What matters is how quran used it and not how arabic language can use it.That is called irrelevant posting which does satisfy your definition.Another excused used by him is that of arabic. ARabic language has got no role in understanding message of Islam thats again an irrelevant comment.These are just few. I can show you plenty.
4) He keeps repeating the same things again and again. This is another sign of a troll
5) Age of Aisha is not at all actually a disputable fact .ITs these dishonest muslims try to invent excuses to throw a smoke screen so that they can hide behind this excuse that age of aisha is disputable and hence muhhamad cannot be a paedophile.
Well if he really believes that its disputable then why couldnt he make a single statement that would support this claim? Every single time he made a claim he was refuted. He couldnt answer a single question .He kept repeating same things again and again.
5) I forgot to tell you the history of this troll. He has multinicked on FFI atleast 10 times. EVerytime he came up with a new profile and when he was refuted he used to wait for some muslim to come and answer for him.When some muslim answered he used to rush immediately to the spot to cheer him.He acted as cheer leader whenever he came up with a new profile.This is yet another sign of a troll.