If it were the hijabi women who assaulted an infidel woman, no doubt the court system would prosecute the infidel woman for dressing inappropriately.
Such is the extent of political correctness in the UK today.
Not even I would make such a silly comment.
I am not so sure it is as silly as it sounds.
Was there not a case of a particularly violent sermon in a UK mosque that was secretly recorded and then made public? My information is that the first reaction of the British police was to prosecute those who made public the recording, until there was a public outcry about it. Am I wrong?
The other thing I remember was a demonstration that occurred in London that called for the "beheading" of those who insult islam. From what I could see, the police just stood there and watched. It is not enough to say that such a person may have been prosecuted later. The very fact that the demonstration was allowed to take place was (in my book) a hate crime against kufars.
I wonder if the police would have stood by and watched a demonstration with a placard that read "Behead those who insult kufars". What do you think?
Then I think of that obnoxious Chaudery (not sure about the spelling), who in a recorded interview said that killing non muslims was OK because according to him they did not accept his allah guy's law, and therefore were not "innocent". Whatever happened to him? Was he charged with a "hate crime"? I would be very interested to know. If he was, it would restore in me at least a little faith that the UK is not descending into Dhimitude.
I am not sure of the spelling of his name, but here is the link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1uQDv_ZtMEWhat would be the reaction of the press if some kufar said that about muslims? Need I say?
My remark was being sarcastic to be sure. But it is a sarcasm that at least has some basis in reality as to the atmosphere of "political correctness" that pervades too many western countries now.
Many westerners are reluctant to utter their distate for anything islamic for fear of being charged with a "hate crime". The Canadian islamic Congress took McLean's Magazine to a human rights tribunal (at taxpayers' expense...McLean's had to defend themselves out of their own pocket) because McLean's wrote some stuff that they didn't like. At such a tribunal, even truth is not a defense.
On the other hand, muslims are allowed to preach a holy book that equates us kufars to "pigs and monkeys", that beating women is OK, and that killing non muslims is OK.
So my statement is not as ridiculous as you suggest. There is just too much going on to show that muslims are being treated as a "protected species".
Topic: Hijabi assaulted in Churchill Square, Brighton