So on that Malik Riaz recently settlement with the National Crime Agency in the UK for an astronomical £190m, the NCA says the agreement was a civil matter and “did not represent a finding of guilt
”. Question is the fate of 190 million pounds., their origins .. over rated property values.. crony banks from 3rd world countries and their relationships with politicians of so-called 2nd world and 3rd world countries and their kith and kin being PHOREN returned foreign nationals with PHOREN PASSPORTS .. and how such large amounts of moves moves from poor countries to POOR CITIES of London Mew York.. etc..etc with very very rich folks.. where as people in these countries are living like this
Oh well Allah /GOD //gods..goddesses and that brain eating fucking god is great .. he is looking from sky watching people living in wretched towns waking foe water with ,malnourished babies .. Oh well allaha god is mighty ..allahgod is great .. but giving drinking water for such mothers I see above would have ,made the HEEeeeeeeeeeeee the dickhead greater than what he is now for me
anyways on those 190 million pounds Ayesha Ijaz Khan pens something in today's Dawn with a heading The fate of £190m
.. well let me read a bit of it..
IN the last couple of decades, London has earned a reputation for becoming a haven for money launderers globally. Its high-end property market has attracted ‘hot money’ from diverse and dubious sources, spanning the gamut from Nigerian generals to Russian oligarchs. Yet, in the last few years, there have been calls for reversing this trend, accounting for the dodgy funds that make their way to the UK capital, and as a result, not only impoverish those from whose countries the funds are transferred but also render the central London property market unaffordable for many Britons.
When Malik Riaz recently settled with the National Crime Agency in the UK for an astronomical £190m, representing the largest settlement of its kind that the NCA had secured, the NCA did say the agreement was a civil matter and “did not represent a finding of guilt”. This, however, cannot be interpreted the way Mr Riaz has been spinning it, to suggest that he has done nothing wrong. The NCA does not obtain a UWO and the respondent does not subsequently settle if there has been no wrongdoing. Given the nature of the law, however, the NCA does not need to establish guilt to proceed. It is the respondent who has to establish his innocence. A UWO can be contested, as it was in the case of Ms Hajiyeva, but she failed in her application to set it aside.
The logical next step, however, would be for the government of Pakistan to order a probe into the alleged corruption that has led to this exorbitant settlement with the NCA. Instead, we witnessed an awkward silence by government functionaries, followed by a press conference by Mr. Shahzad Akbar, in which he announced that the money will be used to pay off Mr Riaz’s liability to the Supreme Court of Pakistan. This is astounding given that the settlement with the NCA has nothing to do with and is completely independent of the Supreme Court of Pakistan’s determination against Mr Riaz and is therefore tantamount to returning the money to Mr Riaz..
Mr Akbar, uncharacteristically reticent to speak about the matter, also noted that he is bound by a confidentiality agreement with the NCA
well you can read tat and more at the link but Let us see how PREEMIER MINSTER IMRAN KHAN solves this problem of Malik Riaz types and others who stash money out of the country instead of paying taxes on their earnings