hi asbie let me move your last sentence to answer your concerns
............. Fact is that there are diseases that are eradicated that people used to get sick and die from quite frequently. Vaccines are the tool that were used to reach that outcome ........
that statement is a fact.... well WAS FACT
......I understand the premise of the argument. That pharm companies would be willing to abuse the borders of a useful practice to squeeze in their own money making production. ......
there is a little doubt on that... Top Selling Psychiatric Drugs (July 2013 To June 2014) is the proof of that...
1. Abilify ($7,240,043,661)
2. Cymbalta ($2,839,722,673)
3. Lyrica ($2,782,036,977)
4. Vyvanse ($1,940,313,035)
5. Namenda ($1,774,338,290)
6. Suboxone ($1,388,999,843)
7. Seroquel XR ($1,266,841,322)
8. Invega Sustenna ($891,518,099)
9. Latuda ($803,311,039)
10. Lunesta ($778,412,409)
....The evidence below suggests that marketing is going a long way to promote drugs. The drugs that are most heavily marketed seem to have some of the largest profits. Additionally drug companies are marketing their drugs as aggressively as possible trying to simply maximize profits......
THAT IS JUST ONE YEAR SALES .,now for these questions
... Problem is this: How would one even research this possibility in an ethical way?
How could you justify experimenting with that outcome?
we can do the experiments and we can justify the experiments but it is costly business and .....NO ONE WILL SUPPORT SUCH INVESTIGATIONS ...
..I will come back to that later with examples from published data in peer reviewed journals in medical field.... including vaccines . Researching published data is also very time consuming business as true information is hidden under heap of junk..