Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Qur'anic studies today
Yesterday at 08:44 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
Yesterday at 04:40 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
Yesterday at 12:50 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
Yesterday at 04:17 AM

What's happened to the fo...
by zeca
April 18, 2024, 06:39 PM

New Britain
April 18, 2024, 05:41 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
April 18, 2024, 05:47 AM

Iran launches drones
April 13, 2024, 09:56 PM

عيد مبارك للجميع! ^_^
by akay
April 12, 2024, 04:01 PM

Eid-Al-Fitr
by akay
April 12, 2024, 12:06 PM

Mock Them and Move on., ...
January 30, 2024, 10:44 AM

Pro Israel or Pro Palesti...
January 29, 2024, 01:53 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: What exactly are religious books trying to tell us? part-1

 (Read 1198 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • What exactly are religious books trying to tell us? part-1
     OP - January 26, 2017, 11:45 PM

    Those who maintain that the Quran’s does not have a violent side, and want to use it as the very foundation to lead their lives I ask, have you ever acted the way the Quran explicitly instructs you to with your Hindu, Christian or non-Muslim neighbour? Do you decline someone’s friendship just because he is a non-Muslim or a person with another faith?
    If not, well, then you are not in sync with the Quran’s mandated etiquettes. And isn’t the Quran “Allah’s Book”? If so, if one chooses to cease this insipid on and off practice of Islam and really, I mean really adopt the Quran as a way life, what happens when he grows in to another ‘Taliban-esque’ figurehead? Whose fault will it be then?

    A verse in Surah Al Baqara offers –

    “I’ve made war ‘Faraz’ (responsibility) for you, and yet you dislike it. In parallel there may be other things that you may not agree with, but they may bear well for you. (2:216)”

    There is another one in Surah Al Nasr which says –

    “Keep waging war for Allah, you are not accountable for anything apart from you well-being! Encourage other Muslims to do so. Soon Allah will diminish the strength and power of the Kafirs. And above all Allah is exceedingly stern when it comes to enacting punishment (4:84).”

    True to these provocative words from the Quran, and riled by Jihad mixed adrenaline, many jumped at the chance to fight shoulder to shoulder with the Taliban in Afghanistan, and wage war against the Jews and the Nasaras. They thought that all they were doing was following Allah’s rules and guidelines. And in many ways they cannot be blamed. On an 18th October 2005 issue of The Daily Prothom Alo in Bangladesh, there was a report which claimed that about 3000 Madrasa students and teachers were “inspired” by the Harkat-Ul-Jihad in the 1980s, to travel to Afghanistan and take on the Soviet army. The fact that the Quran is liable for cultivating this unreasonable hatred towards “Kafirs” in Madrasa students, is irrevocable.

    And those who choose to deny it are simply deluded and ignorant. Every time I try and indulge myself in this sensitive issue, the events of 9/11 tend to float its way into the discussion. The world stopped and grimaced in horror at the deeds of a handful of Jihadi fanatics, who managed to convert entire aeroplane into a weapon and claim thousands of innocent lives. Those who practice Islam for peace will argue that this is work of those who are beguiled and nurture misguided ideals. Not only are they not in sync with what Islam actually is, but they are deluded into thinking that they are pure Muslims, who have only strived to execute Allah’s will to the word.
  • What exactly are religious books trying to tell us? part-1
     Reply #1 - January 26, 2017, 11:50 PM


    All popular contemporary religious beliefs today, where established roughly 2 to 4 thousand years ago. Under these circumstances it cannot be argued that Islam Christianity and Hinduism “eternally” existent. The concept of “eternally” existent religion is a misguided belief. However eternal or otherwise, it is true that the “creation” of religion is a process that was initiated many thousands of years ago. One particular scenario where mankind might have felt the need for “Godly” interventions, are natural disaster. Mother Nature can be cruel at times with an ugly assortment of weapons at her disposal to vent her rage whenever she feels like it. 
     Desperate men and women unable to properly explain (and in a bid to save themselves) the phenomenon behind tornadoes, thunderstorms and floods turned to the alternative explanation of a deity, Gods/Goddesses behind these occurrences. Unable to define death satisfactorily, many resorted to the concept of spirits or unseen souls. Those slightly practiced in the trade of social sciences may have come across all these things. As such based on what we have gathered so far, it is evident that religion or religious faith are nothing but the creation of Neanderthal humans who ruled the world some two hundred and fifty thousand years ago. Before the Neanderthals there was no evidence of practicing religion found during the age of the Pithecanthropus or even the Sinanthropus before them. But the findings of the Neanderthals lacked sophistication - compared to modern beliefs that is. 
     The upper Palaeolithic age (some 40 -98 thousand years ago) saw the concepts spirits, ghosts, religious behaviour and the practice of magic added and integrated into an already growing pile. In comparison to modern religion the Veda religion (predecessor to Hinduism) for example was conceived some 3,500 years ago, while Islam and Christianity were conceived 1400 and 2000 years ago respectively. The religious rules and regulation maintained out of the need to preserve social order and harmony during those days are largely recognized today as being weak, suppressive and even barbaric at times. History again is the silent eyewitness to the Phonicans, Hebrew, Cananights, Mayans, Incans, Aztecas, wolmex, Greek, Roman Carthagian, Tewton, Celts, droid, Gall, Thai, Japanese, the Mauris, Tahitians and the Hawaian citizens, all of whom have “sacrificed” countless men, women and children in order to satisfy these invisible entities they refer to as Gods and Goddesses.
     I have explored these issues in broader detail on the “Poisonous Faith” section on my book. For now let us focus on these books, these religious manuals if you will and try and determine they message they are trying to convey. Formed, moulded and firmly established by modern religion today we undertake a no holds barred approach to analyse their content and decode the mysteries behind the words.
     For those who have memorized or are familiar with The Quran’s content, know for a fact that it has numerous provocative directives strewn all over its pages. For example – 
     
    And wherever you find non-believers kill them (2:191, 9:5), get into conflicts with them,
    so that you may demonstrate hostile behaviour against them (9:123), engage in war against them (8:65). Humiliate the non-believers at every opportunity and impose the “Zizia” tax on them (9:29). And retract the freedom of those who believe other things, and announce that Islam is the only adoptable religion (3:85). This condemns non-believers to hell (5:10), and brands them as ‘unholy’ (9:28); Muslims are encouraged to carry on fighting till all manners of other beliefs are eradicated and Islam is the only religion that exists (2:193). 
     The Koran says that it is only in Islam that a non-believer will be condemned to hell because of the stature he/she maintains, and he/she will be forced to drink pungent smelling pus (18:17). You are encouraged to slice off the hands and legs of non-believers, you are encouraged to dishonourably discharge them from their countries, “There are unimaginable horrors waiting for them in afterlife” (5:38). “For those who did not believe, I have made clothes for them weaved from fire, steaming, boiling water will be poured on their heads so that skins and their stomachs melt, and iron clubs will be used to beat them” (22:19). 
     The Koran explicitly prohibits Muslims from even befriending a Nasar or a Jew (5:51), it even has instructions encouraging you to sever all ties your mother or father if they are non-believers (9:23, 3:28). For those who do not believe in Allah-Rasul, for them a burning pyre is reserved (48:13). For those who die without believing in Islam, state – “wring him by the neck, bind him up and then throw him to the pits of hell. Use chains as long as 70 feet in length to bind him” (69:30-33). It has instructions to commit to warfare in order to appease Allah, where it says “It is good for us, even if we don’t like it, it is” (2:216), and also – “slay the neck of all Kafirs” and immediately after that blood-soaked instruction it says “and bind them up properly” (47:4). Next up is a section where Allah himself has vowed – “I will induce fear into the heart of all Kafirs” and he has specifically instructed believers to “strike Kafirs on their shoulders and to break each and every finger on their hands” (8:12).
  • What exactly are religious books trying to tell us? part-2
     Reply #2 - January 26, 2017, 11:54 PM

    What exactly are religious books trying to tell us? part-2
    Allah has made Jihad mandatory for the ‘Mumin’ and has warned them that, “if you do not willingly engage in Jihad, the most heinous of punishments await you” (9:39). Allah has instructed his beloved Prophet, “Oh prophet, campaign against non-believers and be stern against them - for only the deepest recesses of hell awaits them” (9:73).

    Dear readers, those are just some of the words that constitute The Quran (forget delving into other religious publications for while). Those inundated by their sense of blind faith have dubbed the Quran as ‘the book of guidance’, and have declared Islam as the ‘religion of peace’. It is to those that I pose this question, have you ever wondered if anybody took the above mentioned verses ‘as guidance’ and acted upon them, what sort of “peace” he/she will bring to this world? Thanks to the principles of Jihad ‘Islamic terrorism’ is a well-established term today. Every day the newspapers bear some report or the other describing men or women inspired by the edicts of Jihad, resort to bombing people, open streets, houses, factories, transport, cinema halls, cultural establishments or on the seas or oceans. About a thousand Jihadi groups such as – Al Qaeda, Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Harkat-Ul-Jihad, Harkat-Ul-Mujahidin, Jammat-E-Islamia, Hijab-E-Islamia, Ansaralluah Bangla Team have managed to envelope the world in a never-ending fog of fear.

    The Bangladesh government has banned a few groups such as the Hizbut-Tahri over allegations of terrorism. Before that happened the BNP-Jamat coalition government managed to ban the Jamaitul Mujahidin (JMB), Harkat-Ul-Jihad-Al-Islami Bangladesh (HUZI) during their reign; Shahadat-E-Al-Hikma and the Jagroto Muslim Janata Bangladesh (JMJB) were also banned during their reign due to similar allegations. Harkat-Ul-Jihad first came under the radar of Bangladesh during the year 1996. On the 29th of February that, a joint operation between the police and army, led to the capture of 41 Harkat-Ul-Jihad terrorists along with a raft of guns, bombs and ammunition. They were arrested from the Lundakhali Jungle which is attached to the Painkhali village of Uthia, Cox’s Bazar.

    The group consisted of one foreigner whilst the other forty were comprise of Madrasa students and teachers from all parts of the country. After that on 18th January 1999, during an attack on poet Shamsur Rahman, a total of ten 10 terrorists were arrested, some right from the scene of crime (Shamsur Rahman’s house) and some later from the other areas. They all claimed to be a part of Harkat-Ul-Jihad. And again during the Udichir ceremony in Jessore, on the 23rd July 2000 where bombs were planted in a general assembly held in Gopalgonj Kotalipara set to be attended by none other than the then Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, and of course who can forget 14th April 2001 in Dhaka Ramna, or the grenade attack of 21st August or the 17th August 2005 serial grenade attack all over the country. With these horrifying deeds the Harkat-Ul-Jihad forced themselves into the centre of all diplomatic conversations.

    However the 17th August bombings in 2005, surpass their entire list of obscenities by quite a margin. Readers perhaps many of you remember the horrors of that day. A series of synchronized bombs went off across 63 zillas in Bangladesh. The day was unanimously declared as the blackest spot in the country relatively brief history and was dubbed as Bangladesh’s ‘9/11’. It was evident just how sinister the link between terrorism and “pure” Islam was after a visit was paid to the places whre the bombs set off. The streets there where littered from top to bottom with leaflets and pamphlets ,
    bearing verses from the Quran and Hadith, specifying instructions to go into Jihad or wage war against Kafirs and non-believers. And despite the feeble attempts of people like Farhad Majhar and Badruddin Umra to deny the relationship between pure Islam and terrorism, it was all in vain. Even though the government then oversaw the expulsion of 5 terrorist groups, another 70 strong ones had joined them in secret. Together they are intimating every possibility to cause as much disruption in the country’s affairs as possible. Their main objective of course is to hinder and destabilise the war criminal trials in Bangladesh as much as possible.
     
    It is time for the peace-loving, pious and socially conscious people to undergo a bit of self-realization, and ask from a sceptic’s point of view – Why are all terrorist groups extreme Islamists? Why are they ‘terrorists’ at all’? Who’re the ones responsible for the gradual rise of the Molla Omars, the Bin Ladens, Moulana Mannan, Golam Azam, Sheikh Abdur Rahman, Mufti Hannan and the Bangla Bhais? It’s time to come out of all this obscurity and state with razor sharp clarity that these religious books are at the very root of terrorism. Of course we can add in the imperialistic mind frame of the US in conjunction with that of the Western world and of course, the malevolent foreign policies maintained against the Middle East should not be forgotten as well.
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »