Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Today at 02:45 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
Today at 12:50 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
Today at 04:17 AM

What's happened to the fo...
by zeca
Yesterday at 06:39 PM

New Britain
Yesterday at 05:41 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
Yesterday at 05:47 AM

Iran launches drones
April 13, 2024, 09:56 PM

عيد مبارك للجميع! ^_^
by akay
April 12, 2024, 04:01 PM

Eid-Al-Fitr
by akay
April 12, 2024, 12:06 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 01, 2024, 12:10 PM

Mock Them and Move on., ...
January 30, 2024, 10:44 AM

Pro Israel or Pro Palesti...
January 29, 2024, 01:53 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris

 (Read 13919 times)
  • 12 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     OP - March 03, 2016, 12:32 PM

    A Conversation with Maryam Namazie  "Waking Up with Sam Harris - Throw Open the Gates "

    I am not sure which folder it should go in.. I guess  it should be under → Religions and Gods .. Politics..Science..Brain and what not..    but I was going through it for the past hour after I got hold of it in this post . So me let make new folder.. as it is extremely important discussion for the both  sides of the spectrum

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYtc1ivTLzM

    May be it is a good idea to put those words in writing as an article of a debate..  Well I need listen again between the lines..

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #1 - March 03, 2016, 01:23 PM

    A blog post on this from Homo Economicus

    https://homoeconomicusnet.wordpress.com/2016/03/01/sam-harris-and-maryam-namazie-wake-up-to-disagreement/
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #2 - March 03, 2016, 11:30 PM

    It was a frustrating exchange. Maryam I think is right to say we should just be profiling Islamist mosques for jihadists, but her insistence that she is completely against profiling across the board because it collectivizes blame is directly contradictory to her previous claim. She kept saying to profile is to hold an entire group accountable for the actions of a few, yet she would turn around and say we should monitor Islamist mosques because there might be jihadists among them.

    Not all Islamists are jihadists Maryam. Either drop the statement that profiling collectivizes blame or give up profiling groups of people if you want to act like you're guiltless of holding a group accountable for the actions of an individual.

    Sam still should drop his views on profiling. He keeps changing what he means by this, and it's getting him into way more trouble than need be. Profiling all Muslims is a bad idea. You can make a theoretical case for profiling all you want, but since we're actually talking about government policy, we need to stick to the facts and stay in the practical realm.

    Sam should also read between the lines a little more. Just because Tommy Robinson comes off as rational and not intolerant in a public interview doesn't mean he doesn't harbor disturbing private views. Bigotry is rarely openly expressed, and sometimes you need to look beyond the bare meaning of the words someone uses to make their point. Actions are usually more indicative of where a person truly lies.

    On refugee policy, the open doors policy Maryam was espousing seemed pretty naive. Yes, some of the concern about refugees coming over and taking over and taking over countries (i.e. Eurabia) are racist and unfounded, but countries should be able to cap how many they take in. She even refused to make a distinction between genuine refugees of war, to those looking for mere economic opportunity. Mass immigration can cause serious assimilation problems (especially if you say you don't care if they're Islamists as Maryam says) and employment problems among other things.

    I don't see free movement of people's as a basic human right. Countries should have a say in how many they decide to take in.

    "I moreover believe that any religion that has anything in it that shocks the mind of a child, cannot be a true system."
    -Thomas Paine
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #3 - March 04, 2016, 02:28 AM

    Quote
    Countries should have a say in how many they decide to take in.


    Really boggles me just how crazy people think open-border is okay.

    You can immigrate anywhere. Doesn't need open border for that to happen.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #4 - March 04, 2016, 03:51 AM

    yeah Maryam came off as a bit confused when she said its wrong to target mosques but ok to target salafi mosques and right to profile islamists and not to profile muslims.

    Its as if there is some way to distinguish between "salafi" and "conservative sunni"  and "Islamist" and "Conservative muslim"



    There is way way too much overlap between those categories that even exmuslims raised in conservative environments who have a knowledge of islamic theology couldn't place people solidly in one category or another.


    In my opinion a life without curiosity is not a life worth living
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #5 - March 04, 2016, 04:45 AM

    Yeah but I think you could find mosques in which there is no point profiling and kinda figure out certain mosques that are more high risk.

    "I moreover believe that any religion that has anything in it that shocks the mind of a child, cannot be a true system."
    -Thomas Paine
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #6 - March 04, 2016, 02:03 PM

    I know of a problematic mosque in my city but the mosque is just super conservative sunni not salafi. A salafi mosque is not necessarily at higher risk for radicalization.

    You can radicalize a deobandi just as easily as a salafi

    Progressive muslims pretend there is some huge difference between salafism and regular conservative Islam when there really is not much difference to be honest.

    Many salafis teach in regular sunni institutes and mosques as well.

    Its only the takfiri fringe of the salafi movement that completely dissociates with the mainstream muslim community.


    In my opinion a life without curiosity is not a life worth living
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #7 - March 04, 2016, 02:41 PM

    I love Maryam. She has a heart.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #8 - March 04, 2016, 02:42 PM

    At least in the States, profiling a “mosque” is kind of pointless. Sure, one mosque might have an imam that is slightly more firebrand than another, but that says nothing about the people who actually pray there. Mosques are unique in terms of the way community centers usually work in that their primary focus is to serve as a place for people to come in and make salah 5 times a day. Anyone is free to come in and do that. Hell, I prayed in a mosque a few weeks ago just for the heck of it and I’m not even a Muslim.

    Often times in any given mosque, you’ll have a whole spectrum of different ideologies and schools of thought all bowing and kneeling in essentially the same way. The only unifying factor is location and the fact that one particular building designated a “mosque” happened to be closest to them all. You’d really have to infiltrate the different cliques that might form in one mosque or another in order to make some progress.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #9 - March 04, 2016, 02:43 PM

    It would scare me shitless if someone like Sam Harris ever got into power.

    Sometimes the "logical" thing to do is not always the 'right' thing to do.

    Man is made of both the heart & the mind - reason & emotion.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #10 - March 04, 2016, 06:30 PM

    Really boggles me just how crazy people think open-border is okay.

    You can immigrate anywhere. Doesn't need open border for that to happen.


    No you can't. 

    Not unless you are able fulfil conditions set by the powers that be. 

    I do believe that free movement is a basic human right.  Countries are nothing but the playgrounds of those that believe they own them.

    Am I naive enough to believe this doesn't have it's own problems?  fuck no.  But I also don't believe that I should be denied access to a country, because I lack the wealth, or acceptable background to be considered legitimately welcome. 


    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #11 - March 04, 2016, 06:42 PM

    Yeah but you're on the whole a good, decent person Berbs. It's the rotten eggs that spoil the bunch.

    Open borders in the short term are going to cause more problems and suffering, allowing for things like human trafficking among other things to become easier. For open borders to work, conditions in the different places need to improve, and there needs to be a trust of different countries to work together to solve problems. Without those sorts of things, I don't think for example EU would a have formed.

    So yeah, you do something like open a border between North and South Korea, or USA and Mexico, or whatever the relevant border in Europe is, you're going to have significant problems in the short term and I can only imagine things getting much, much worse before they could get better.

    And I'm a dude who thinks that nation-states are fucking stupid and should really eventually be done away with, so yeah.  Tongue

    how fuck works without shit??


    Let's Play Chess!

    harakaat, friend, RIP
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #12 - March 04, 2016, 07:30 PM

    Yeah but you're on the whole a good, decent person Berbs. It's the rotten eggs that spoil the bunch.]

    Open borders in the short term are going to cause more problems and suffering, allowing for things like human trafficking among other things to become easier. For open borders to work, conditions in the different places need to improve, and there needs to be a trust of different countries to work together to solve problems. Without those sorts of things, I don't think for example EU would a have formed.

    So yeah, you do something like open a border between North and South Korea, or USA and Mexico, or whatever the relevant border in Europe is, you're going to have significant problems in the short term and I can only imagine things getting much, much worse before they could get better.

    And I'm a dude who thinks that nation-states are fucking stupid and should really eventually be done away with, so yeah.  Tongue


    I agree.  Right now the problems would be too immense, no doubt about it, but definitely if certain things changed, if open migration began to seem attractive in both ways, and not just to the West way, then it could work.

    But knowing that there will be problems, well that doesn't detract from the fact that ultimately free movement is a basic human right.

    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #13 - March 04, 2016, 08:06 PM

    ...
    But knowing that there will be problems, well that doesn't detract from the fact that ultimately free movement is a basic human right.

    Well that may be true  in an Utopian idealistic socialistic society where everyone is a Human being  but question is out of 7 billion or so so-called human beings living on the planet ., how many of us take such an idealist path??

    And how many of you  read that guy Thomas More??  Saint Thomas More....7 February 1478 – 6 July 1535..
    Quote
    On 1 July 1535, More was tried before a panel of judges that included the new Lord Chancellor, Sir Thomas Audley, as well as Anne Boleyn's father, brother, and uncle. He was charged with high treason for denying the validity of the Act of Supremacy and was tried under the following section of the Treason Act 1534.

    The jury took only fifteen minutes, however, to find More guilty.

    After the jury's verdict was delivered and before his sentencing, More spoke freely of his belief that "no temporal man may be the head of the spirituality". He was sentenced to be hanged, drawn and quartered (the usual punishment for traitors who were not the nobility), but the King commuted this to execution by decapitation. The execution took place on 6 July 1535.


    That is how god/allah/ whatever inside the brains of  highly intelligent evolved animal species works....   So those borde less no crime no police..no king.. no ruler society only works in that allah/god heaven.. or in allah/god hell..

    well read it .. click that book picture



    and read the 2nd part of pdf file  Utopia _Book II  by Sir Thomas More


    well  behead ....  behead...that was the name of the game in medieval societies and that is still name of the game to terrorize public in 21st century..

    why is that? who knows.. big Al knows the best..

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #14 - March 05, 2016, 07:03 AM

    No you can't. 

    Not unless you are able fulfil conditions set by the powers that be. 

    I do believe that free movement is a basic human right.  Countries are nothing but the playgrounds of those that believe they own them.

    Am I naive enough to believe this doesn't have it's own problems?  fuck no.  But I also don't believe that I should be denied access to a country, because I lack the wealth, or acceptable background to be considered legitimately welcome. 


    A country should be able to set whatever quality standards they want / don't want. If a country doesn't want to accept criminals from coming in, they can do it.

    Ditto with other qualifications they need.

    Quote
    It would scare me shitless if someone like Sam Harris ever got into power.

    Sometimes the "logical" thing to do is not always the 'right' thing to do.

    Man is made of both the heart & the mind - reason & emotion.


    I mean... it is done by his heart too, the heart that wants peace and whatever else he desires.

    It's just that... he's not going to be the victim of his own policy so it's easy for him to say that...

    But yeah, a lot of new atheists speaker lack "the heart" to persuade people to join their cause. For the most part they come off arrogant and snobby. Not a good thing...
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #15 - March 05, 2016, 10:06 AM

    A country should be able to set whatever quality standards they want / don't want. If a country doesn't want to accept criminals from coming in, they can do it.

    Ditto with other qualifications they need.



    The country?

    Countries have no thoughts or feelings, they have no ability to think about what sort of people they want walking all over it/

    It is not countries, it is people, and it is not all people, it is some people.

    But I get from your tone, you are one of 'those' people.  The sort of people that have no qualms about taking human rights away from their 'others', and right now 'country' is the way in which you excuse it.   Smiley

    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #16 - March 05, 2016, 10:13 AM

    As if criminals are the only ones that 'countries' don't want.  Grin

    As if criminality was always fairly judged.  Grin


    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #17 - March 05, 2016, 11:00 AM

    I agree.  Right now the problems would be too immense, no doubt about it, but definitely if certain things changed, if open migration began to seem attractive in both ways, and not just to the West way, then it could work.

    But knowing that there will be problems, well that doesn't detract from the fact that ultimately free movement is a basic human right.

    This is true. But the system is set up in such a way so as to allow and encourage the flow of capital and labour one way and not the other. And the industrialized capitalist countries want labour in their countries to stay labour, to not become citizenry, not be part of the political culture and process. Because to accept them as citizens would be to empower them to influence politics and god forbid change the system. But they do want them as labourers. This is why temporary foreign worker programs exist. This is why governments turn a blind eye to undocumented workers. Because they're beneficial for capital. They plummet the price of labour and give capitalists a large pool of labourers who are not politically involved and can't even unionize or demand rights, because a) they're terrified, and b) many times they're not invested in their host country enough to actually want to change it, because they know they have to go back to their home countries.

    The world economy is set up in such a way that prevents the Global South from developing. For instance, following the 2008 recession, one of the biggest factors that created shockwaves in the South Asian economies was a result of the policies of the Arab Gulf states. The Gulf states started deporting migrant labourers, and that drove unemployment up the roof in their home countries, and obviously that meant the workers couldn't bring any more money to their home countries that would stimulate economic growth. And that's what's so fucked up about the whole of global capitalism: even in recessions the capitalists reap benefits, because it allows them to flex their powers and show weaker countries who's boss in the world.

    And, again, even in good times, the Global South is being screwed over by preventing its emmigrants from integrating into their host countries that would allow them to actually reap the benefits they would otherwise be reaping from immigration. Imagine what would happen if migrant workers actually had full rights. Imagine how much money they'd be able to send back home, how much they'd stimulate their own economies, how many of their kids they'd be able to send to good schools and give them the power to break out of the cycle of poverty, that would make them no longer need to migrate to shitty countries where they get shitty pay, working shitty hours in shitty, shitty conditions.

    And that's exactly why I support open borders. Not in an ideal world, but right now. Because it puts a huge dent in the system and empowers developing countries to actually develop. Opening up the borders is one of the best and easiest and most straightforward ways for a radical transformation of the entire global system of capitalism. It would enable workers to unionize, to have class consciousness. It would empower them to fight for their rights to get paid something that resembles the amount of work they do. It would empower their home countries to grow and thrive. And then maybe, just maybe, migration would look attractive both ways.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXlhM57zQ44
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #18 - March 05, 2016, 12:24 PM

    This is true. But the system is set up in such a way so as to allow and encourage the flow of capital and labour one way and not the other. And the industrialized capitalist countries want labour in their countries to stay labour, to not become citizenry, not be part of the political culture and process. .....................

    is that true? I thought in western countries such as  AMRIKA., Canada, England .. Netherlands, France.. etc..etc   allows immigrants to become citizen and citizenry also participate in their  political culture and processes.....

     Can't the immigrants that are born in other countries become member of parliament in those countries?

    So going back to the subject of Throw Open the Gates: Sam Harris-Maryam Namazie.. discourse . let me put some links of what people are saying..

    Quote


    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #19 - March 05, 2016, 02:01 PM

    Quote
    But I get from your tone, you are one of 'those' people.  The sort of people that have no qualms about taking human rights away from their 'others', and right now 'country' is the way in which you excuse it.

    As if criminals are the only ones that 'countries' don't want.

    As if criminality was always fairly judged.


    How is that supposed to make anything okay? Criminality wasn't always fairly judged, so I guess screw background checks? Screw the government, screw the police?

    The regulations are there to protect the citizens AND other immigrants. I mean, what's the point of immigrating if you're going to go back to the culture you came from? You go to other countries and a-ha!!! You meet the same kind of people you try to escape from? Is that the point?

    Yes, people don't want their culture to be erased. Yes some people actually like the way they live now, the community and they don't want it to change. That is also human rights. To feel safe. I feel better that the immigration process actually include background checks. At least I have some assurance that the immigrants that do get in, are pretty decent people. Considering most immigrants stick together and have their own community, that is pretty damn important.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #20 - March 05, 2016, 03:51 PM

    i suspect this is not a popular view here… but I dont get open borders.. ive always viewed country like a home. people dont just let anybody into their homes…why just let anybody into your country?

    sam harris is a hateful bigoted snob...west is best and muslims are so evil we might need to nuke them basically sums up his worldview.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #21 - March 05, 2016, 07:20 PM

    This is true. But the system is set up in such a way so as to allow and encourage the flow of capital and labour one way and not the other. And the industrialized capitalist countries want labour in their countries to stay labour, to not become citizenry, not be part of the political culture and process. Because to accept them as citizens would be to empower them to influence politics and god forbid change the system. But they do want them as labourers. This is why temporary foreign worker programs exist. This is why governments turn a blind eye to undocumented workers. Because they're beneficial for capital. They plummet the price of labour and give capitalists a large pool of labourers who are not politically involved and can't even unionize or demand rights, because a) they're terrified, and b) many times they're not invested in their host country enough to actually want to change it, because they know they have to go back to their home countries.

    The world economy is set up in such a way that prevents the Global South from developing. For instance, following the 2008 recession, one of the biggest factors that created shockwaves in the South Asian economies was a result of the policies of the Arab Gulf states. The Gulf states started deporting migrant labourers, and that drove unemployment up the roof in their home countries, and obviously that meant the workers couldn't bring any more money to their home countries that would stimulate economic growth. And that's what's so fucked up about the whole of global capitalism: even in recessions the capitalists reap benefits, because it allows them to flex their powers and show weaker countries who's boss in the world.

    And, again, even in good times, the Global South is being screwed over by preventing its emmigrants from integrating into their host countries that would allow them to actually reap the benefits they would otherwise be reaping from immigration. Imagine what would happen if migrant workers actually had full rights. Imagine how much money they'd be able to send back home, how much they'd stimulate their own economies, how many of their kids they'd be able to send to good schools and give them the power to break out of the cycle of poverty, that would make them no longer need to migrate to shitty countries where they get shitty pay, working shitty hours in shitty, shitty conditions.

    And that's exactly why I support open borders. Not in an ideal world, but right now. Because it puts a huge dent in the system and empowers developing countries to actually develop. Opening up the borders is one of the best and easiest and most straightforward ways for a radical transformation of the entire global system of capitalism. It would enable workers to unionize, to have class consciousness. It would empower them to fight for their rights to get paid something that resembles the amount of work they do. It would empower their home countries to grow and thrive. And then maybe, just maybe, migration would look attractive both ways.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXlhM57zQ44


    Oh, I agree.  I just honestly couldn't drum up the energy to type up the entire argument, for someone, who still after your post, would post this:

    How is that supposed to make anything okay? Criminality wasn't always fairly judged, so I guess screw background checks? Screw the government, screw the police?

    The regulations are there to protect the citizens AND other immigrants. I mean, what's the point of immigrating if you're going to go back to the culture you came from? You go to other countries and a-ha!!! You meet the same kind of people you try to escape from? Is that the point?

    Yes, people don't want their culture to be erased. Yes some people actually like the way they live now, the community and they don't want it to change. That is also human rights. To feel safe. I feel better that the immigration process actually include background checks. At least I have some assurance that the immigrants that do get in, are pretty decent people. Considering most immigrants stick together and have their own community, that is pretty damn important.


    Consider me psychic, but I saw this coming.  I don't have the same energy for debate that I once had.

    However, I completely agree absurdist, things need to change now, in order that they become better.  Trouble is, way too many people (as evidenced in Helaine's post), do not want to take the rough part of it, regardless of how many people it hurts.


    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #22 - March 05, 2016, 11:33 PM

    I thought Helaine expressed a perfectly decent concern. Nothing in her (his? I don't know) post showed ignorance of absurdist's previous post. I don't know why you would act incredulous that Helaine might respond that way.

    This seems like a dismissive attempt to brand any practical objections to such idealism as heartless and not coming from a place of genuine concern.

    When it comes to floods of people migrating with vastly different values, beliefs, and levels of education, this can cause some serious problems. Seems to me Britain is having a hard enough time already integrating its migrants in with the rest of society. Now does not seem the time to throw open the gates.

    "I moreover believe that any religion that has anything in it that shocks the mind of a child, cannot be a true system."
    -Thomas Paine
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #23 - March 05, 2016, 11:59 PM

    ..............................

    When it comes to floods of people migrating with vastly different values, beliefs, and levels of education, this can cause some serious problems. ..................


    this present time is a very bad time to do that ., this probably could have been done some 30 years ago,, before Afghanistan... before 9/11.. before Iraq war... Before AMRIKA oil hunger... I wish we had internet at that time.. off course  I my self was very very angry... angry little guy.. I am glad the home/the hutch  where I lived didn't had guns.,

    now it is impossible ., may be 20 years down the road with lots patience and lots money that need to be spent on education..

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #24 - March 06, 2016, 12:12 AM

    This seems like a dismissive attempt to brand any practical objections to such idealism as heartless and not coming from a place of genuine concern.

    Not everyone has the time and patience and energy to deal with views they think are bullshit. Some people are too exhausted dealing with real life to entertain other people's circle jerks and mental masturbation. No one is obligated to respond to anyone else's bullshit.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #25 - March 06, 2016, 02:04 AM

    Quote
    Trouble is, way too many people (as evidenced in Helaine's post), do not want to take the rough part of it, regardless of how many people it hurts.


    Is that how it is? If it's "people like me" who's hurting, then we're just... don't want to take the rough part of it, but if it's "people like you" hurting, then that's REAL HURT and everybody else is so cruel?

    Do you really not consider anybody else in your equation?

    Are you really aware of the bad part of it or are you just pretending? I have lived most of my adult life as an immigrant. Everywhere I go, the immigration rules actually get stricter as time goes by. I have lived in Indonesia, Korea, and China now. The immigration rules are pretty basic, so I don't get why people really hate it. If you're only talking about gulf countries, then maybe state it in your post. Gulf countries are one of those countries that require exit visa (like, Indonesia). Exit Visa is bullshit.

    It used to be, any native English speakers can just go in and teach English. Now, every country I know require actual teaching license. Another example, Indonesia is really against foreign companies going in and "stealing" resources.

    Here is the requirement for immigrants to work:

    1. Criminal background check
    2. Endorsement from the company you work for (you must have a job).
    3. Health inspection... You can't get in if you have SARS, obviously. Possibly no health insurance if you're already seriously ill.
    4. If you bring spouse/children, then family+marriage certificate, birth certificate for your children, etc. They must pass all the previous checks.

    Can you state if any of this is unfair? The requirements will vary depending on where you go, because some countries will probably cap off the amount of immigrant workers depending on the unemployment rates in their country. Part of the host country's concern is to keep their own people employed, and that takes priorities over immigrants.

    Some countries are very discriminating. In Indonesia and China, immigrant rights are almost non-existent. But of course, in these countries it's not like human rights are any better, so... Gulf states also have exit visa and they commonly take your passport so you can't get out, that's horrifying. However, many countries do have fair immigration system.

    I thought Helaine expressed a perfectly decent concern. Nothing in her (his? I don't know) post showed ignorance of absurdist's previous post. I don't know why you would act incredulous that Helaine might respond that way.

    This seems like a dismissive attempt to brand any practical objections to such idealism as heartless and not coming from a place of genuine concern.

    When it comes to floods of people migrating with vastly different values, beliefs, and levels of education, this can cause some serious problems. Seems to me Britain is having a hard enough time already integrating its migrants in with the rest of society. Now does not seem the time to throw open the gates.


    The way I take it, is that the host' values are not important. None of the host countries' concern are valid and regulations are heartless.

    I mean, immigrant integration is one of the concern most people have when it comes to accepting immigrants.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #26 - March 06, 2016, 02:13 AM

    The immigration rules are pretty basic, so I don't get why people really hate it.

    I'm glad you have objective experience of the world and don't care to take other people's points of view into account. You commit the same shit you accuse Berbs of committing while accusing her.
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #27 - March 06, 2016, 09:16 AM

     I my self was very very angry... angry little guy.. I am glad the home/the hutch  where I lived didn't had guns.,


    Hahaha  Cheesy

    Jihadi Yeezee

    No free mixing of the sexes is permitted on these forums or via PM or the various chat groups that are operating.

    Women must write modestly and all men must lower their case.

    http://www.ummah.com/forum/showthread.php?425649-Have-some-Hayaa-%28modesty-shame%29-people!
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #28 - March 06, 2016, 10:15 AM

    .same shit ........

     Hmm Same shit., Shit is flying all over  and shit is hitting the fan

    Hahaha  Cheesy

    Jihadi Yeezee

    well Time never stops  but the secret I am spewing on internet is that  "yeeze is still Jihadi"........and My grand son married a Muslim Girl of Gujarati origins  and it is his 4th marriage ..

    Let me wish him good luck .. It is all OK... It is all wonderful and I bless them   long and wonderful life together




    I am glad he choose the right one as she never wore a Burkha..

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • A Conversation with Maryam Namazie and Sam Harris
     Reply #29 - March 06, 2016, 11:31 AM

    Well that may be true  in an Utopian idealistic socialistic society where everyone is a Human being  but question is out of 7 billion or so so-called human beings living on the planet ., how many of us take such an idealist path??


    Afro

    Utopian idealistic socialistic society. Music to my ears. Exactly the society I was living 25 years ago, where there were no freaking capitalist rich people and everybody were equally poor. Wonderful. And so many people here and in the West are still so extraordinary naive to think such a place could exist and function in the same time.   
  • 12 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »