Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →


Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?


Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts

Game of Thrones
Today at 12:10 PM

Charlottesville: one dead...
Today at 11:19 AM

At least 13 dead as van r...
Today at 09:01 AM

What music are you listen...
Today at 12:43 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Yesterday at 09:59 PM

How did you tell them?
Yesterday at 08:28 PM

CEMB Greatest Hits - post...
Yesterday at 05:29 PM

Australian leader wears b...
Yesterday at 01:22 PM

New here..
Yesterday at 07:12 AM

Yesterday at 03:30 AM

Real life Miracles /relig...
August 16, 2017, 11:44 PM

ماذا يحدث هذه الايام؟؟؟.
August 16, 2017, 12:34 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Random Islamic History Posts

 (Read 37067 times)
  • Previous page 1 ... 12 13 14« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #390 - July 19, 2017, 09:39 AM

    Nur Sobers-Khan - The Shahnameh as propaganda for World War II
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #391 - July 24, 2017, 08:23 AM

    Thread on the origins of monotheism:
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #392 - July 24, 2017, 08:30 AM

    Peter Webb on Ibn Qutaybah - When Arabophones weren’t Arabs: Ibn Qutaybah and identity formation during the early period of Islam
    Peter Webb, a lecturer in Arabic literature and culture at the University of Leiden, is author of Imagining the Arabs: Arab Identity and the Rise of Islam (2016), and editor-translator of the entertaining second part of the Library of Arabic Literature’s The Excellence of the Arabs, “Excellence of Arab Learning.”

    In our two-part discussion with the translator of the first half, Sarah Savant ... we talked about the challenges of translating Ibn Qutaybah, his central place in Western scholarship, and his apparent incapacity for humor.

    In this first part of a two-part discussion, Webb speaks talks about the construction of Arab identity during the early period of Islam, the importance of translating Ibn Quataybah, and why this book should be interesting to those who study medieval history.

    Quote from: Peter Webb
    when Ibn Qutaybah was writing, the elites of the caliphate were really dropping the whole notion that we need to be proper Arabs, and the idea that kinship with Arabs was related to legitimate political authority.

    What was more at stake at this point was more of a cultural question. Which was: Looking back, over the three-hundred-year history that they were aware of in the ninth century, they knew there had been a Persian Empire, and a Byzantine Empire—which they called the Romans—and that the Arabs were a people somewhat apart from this, in Arabia.

    The conquest had happened, Islamization had occurred, and then a cultural question came: Which of these ancestors of our Iraqi civilization were better? And a number of the people who had written before Ibn Qutaybah had made an argument that maybe the Persians were superior—that they had been militarily defeated by the Muslim conquerors, but that they’d had a greater civilization and culture.

    This is an important point. Because if the Persians were greater, does that mean we should drop some of the things that come along with Arabness? Does that mean that Islam was an outsider religion? What they needed to try to do, in response, was articulate a system where they could be proud of the Islamic heritage and not have to look down on Arabs culturally.

    The solution was: If we conceptualize the Arabs not as necessarily ourselves, but as this imagined community in pre-Islamic Arabia, and if we think about them as a people who have a peculiar culture and peculiar kinds of knowledge that are separate and independent from all other civilizations, then there’s no point in comparing them to the Persians or the Byzantines. Because what the Arabs were good at was separate from what the Persians or what the Byzantines were good at.

    Therefore, you can’t look down on the Arabs anymore, because you’re not comparing like to like. Now, what you can say is that these were a worthy people who participated in knowledge and learning. They didn’t necessarily have the same book culture or urban culture that the Persians and the Byzantines had. But they had their own good culture. Then they came in and brought Islam, and now we are all proud beneficiaries of this.
    What the book does, somewhat deftly, is say that the Arabs had a very learned culture before Islam. This learned culture was different from all the other civilizations, but it was certainly not inferior. And in fact, you could make the point that it was superior, in terms of their knowledge of language, their knowledge of natural phenomena, their poetry.

    They articulated a sense of Arab culture around an idealized Bedouin community. And that, which was then attached to Islam, became the stereotype of the Arabs ever since. That’s one of the interesting legacies of the book, because today it’s very common for people to associate Arab identity with the desert, and we do that because we trace the genealogy of our thinking about Arabs, and it goes back many hundreds of years, to early Europeans who read books like this one, that were adamant that Arab culture was a Bedouin thing.

    So these Bedouin stereotypes have been much embedded in our thinking, thanks to the fact that we’ve read these kinds of books—that were creating a Bedouin stereotype relevant to ninth-century urban Iraqis.
    I think people who are interested in the idea of Arab identity should look at this book because Arab identity is a big topic, but what’s intriguing is that people are very quick to see the constructedness and the weird contours of Arab identity in the modern era, but we kind of assume that in the old days, Arabs were Arabs, and they were desert people.

    Reading pre-modern texts about Arabness is quite important to help us see where this identity came from, how Arab identity was constructed. It’s important to open up the pre-modern period to more inquiry about the roots of Arab identity. The stereotypes we hold about Arabs today are directly relatable to books like these. So the more we know about them, and the more we understand about why they were created, the better we can appraise Arabness as an identity today.

    The book should also be interesting to  people who study medieval history of the rest of the world, because this was a time, in the post-Roman world, in which the identities of the modern European nations — the Franks, the Anglo Saxons, and even German identities — were being constructed in Europe. It’s really at the same time that Arabness was being constructed in the Middle East, so from a comparative perspective of the birth of modern nations, this book would be very helpful to people who know a lot about how Anglo Saxon identity was constructed, for instance. I think it would probably be very intriguing for them to look at how Arabness was being constructed.

    I think medievalists in general might otherwise take the idea of Arab identity as something fixed. But we’ll see, in this sort of book, that it was anything but. The same sort of processes that were happening in Europe were going on in the East as well.

  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #393 - July 24, 2017, 01:26 PM

    (Clicky for piccy!)

    Nur Sobers-Khan - The Shahnameh as propaganda for World War II

    that is nonsense and very imaginative with little relevance to 2nd worldwar..  did she(Nur Sobers-Khan) really that ?

    Do not let silence become your legacy  
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #394 - July 29, 2017, 10:37 PM

    Hassan Farhang Ansari - Patricia Crone’s Contribution to Iranian Studies
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #395 - July 30, 2017, 01:28 AM

    re Farhang Ansari's article,
    While traditional scholarship has focused on the cosmopolitan centers and elitist circles among the ethnic Iranian population during the ʿAbbāsid period (and beyond), Crone opted in addition to this for another, entirely different, approach to studying the “two centuries of silence.” She followed the lead of Ghulām Ḥusayn Ṣadīqī in his Ph.D. dissertation of 1938, “Les mouvements religieux iraniens aux IIe et IIIe siècles de l'Hégire,” but went well beyond Ṣadīqī’s pioneering work. Instead of focusing only on the elites, Crone studied the various rebel movements that, according to her view, were led by formerly acculturated Iranian natives who, in their disappointment of being unable to gain recognition in the eyes of the Arab conquerors, turned to their past, its culture, and its religious and societal values. The majority among them did not originate in the urban cosmopolitan centers of Iran but rather in rural areas, this being another unusual focus of Crone’s work. It is this approach that renders her work highly original.

    Zarrīnkūb's "Two Centuries of Silence", which as zeca (I think) and I noted above is translated into English now, had studied those rebel movements as well. It's just that Zarrīnkūb was engaged in an Iranian nationalist project and not a scholarly one.

    UPDATE: Not "above"; different thread.
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #396 - August 03, 2017, 06:42 PM

    Alan Mikhail - The moment in history when Muslims began to see dogs as dirty, impure, and evil

    But see the comments from Sean Anthony here:
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #397 - August 03, 2017, 11:07 PM

    Quote from: Sean Anthony
    1/ Sorry to say, but the article's claim that negative attitudes towards dogs r modern is quite ignorant. Just read Mālik’s Muwaṭṭaʾ.

    Once again I call shenanigans on Twitter quotes here because I still don't have Twitter (or Gab etc).

    I am looking at Shaybāni's Muwaṭṭaʾ. In it I find a rule that one may kill a wild (or rabid) dog with no repercussions: 5.17.426-7. Otherwise I find an 'Umarid rule that one may eat the catch of a hunting-dog: 8.16.657. And here is 17.39.933, Mālik < Sumayy < Abu Salih al-Sammām < Abu Hurayra <
    Quote from: the Messenger of Allah (saw)
    While a man was walking on the road he became terribly thirsty and then he found a well, and so he climbed down into it and drank. Then he came out and found a dog panting, eating the soil from thirst. So he said, 'this dog is as thirsty as I was,' and so he climbed down into the well and filled his leathern sock [sic], held it tight in his mouth until he had climbed out and gave the dog to drink. Allah accepted his action and forgave him.

    On the one hand, I can allow that Mālik didn't much like dogs himself, using one here as a case for the general principle of being a good person who is kind to animals, even dogs. But elsewhere I gather that the first Hanafis and the family of  'Umar had no problem with dogs.
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #398 - August 04, 2017, 05:30 PM

    Mizan Journal volume 2 issue 1: The Evolution and Uses of the Stories of the Prophets
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #399 - August 07, 2017, 09:54 AM

    Forthcoming book

    Nikolay Antov - The Ottoman "Wild West": The Balkan Frontier in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries
    In the late fifteenth century, the north-eastern Balkans were under-populated and under-institutionalized. Yet, by the end of the following century, the regions of Deliorman and Gerlovo were home to one of the largest Muslim populations in southeast Europe. Nikolay Antov sheds fresh light on the mechanics of Islamization along the Ottoman frontier, and presents an instructive case study of the 'indigenization' of Islam - the process through which Islam, in its diverse doctrinal and socio-cultural manifestations, became part of a distinct regional landscape. Simultaneously, Antov uses a wide array of administrative, narrative-literary, and legal sources, exploring the perspectives of both the imperial center and regional actors in urban, rural, and nomadic settings, to trace the transformation of the Ottoman polity from a frontier principality into a centralized empire. Contributing to the further understanding of Balkan Islam, state formation and empire building, this unique text will appeal to those studying Ottoman, Balkan, and Islamic World history.

  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #400 - August 08, 2017, 11:43 AM

    Imitation Islamic dirham issued by the Khazars:
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #401 - August 08, 2017, 12:31 PM

    Imitation Islamic dirham issued by the Khazars:

    Do not let silence become your legacy  
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #402 - August 11, 2017, 08:46 AM

    Palimpsests from St Catherine's Monastery:
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #403 - August 12, 2017, 09:10 AM

    David Vishanoff - A Critical Introduction to Islamic Legal Theory: a critical edition, English translation, and new commentary on Imām al‑Ḥaramayn al-Juwaynī’s Leaflet on the Sources of Law (Kitāb al‑Waraqāt fī uṣūl al‑fiqh)
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #404 - August 14, 2017, 09:22 PM

    Frank Griffel - Contradictions and Lots of Ambiguity: Two New Perspectives on Premodern (and Postclassical) Islamic Societies. Review Article of Shahab Ahmed's "What is Islam?" and Thomas Bauer's "Die Kultur der Ambiguität."ät._
  • Random Islamic History Posts
     Reply #405 - August 16, 2017, 08:09 AM

    Fighting Nazis – Middle Eastern and Islamic Style:
  • Previous page 1 ... 12 13 14« Previous thread | Next thread »