Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


مدهش----- لماذا؟؟؟؟
by akay
Yesterday at 09:34 PM

Qur'anic studies today
Yesterday at 08:07 PM

Kashmir endgame
Yesterday at 06:31 PM

The Battle for British Is...
Yesterday at 10:04 AM

NayaPakistan...New Pakist...
August 17, 2019, 01:37 PM

hindus in India beat A M...
August 17, 2019, 01:23 PM

What music are you listen...
August 15, 2019, 09:05 PM

Human Rights and Wrongs
August 14, 2019, 04:47 PM

New PM incoming
August 13, 2019, 07:27 PM

Eid Al-Adha
August 13, 2019, 01:00 PM

Happy-clappy reformers
August 13, 2019, 11:58 AM

Dutch burka ban
August 10, 2019, 10:17 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?

 (Read 4059 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     OP - November 09, 2014, 01:11 PM

    The strongest video I have seen isn't even from dawkins or hitch or sagan etc, it is from the comedian George carlin;

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RT6rL2UroE

    RIP Rufus


    What is the strongest atheist video you've seen ?
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #1 - November 09, 2014, 01:14 PM

    RIP George Carlin. He didn't do bullshit.  Cheesy
    Coincidentally this video, made me start to doubt my religion too.

    Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #2 - November 09, 2014, 08:23 PM

    this is religilous opened up my eyes to alot of religious  bullshit
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #3 - November 09, 2014, 08:47 PM

    Yes, George Carlin's RIBS is an all-time classic - Nay! A legend! The video really hit the spot and made me realise how bloody stupid I have been all these years!! lol

    RIP George! - I hope you give God hell up there  grin12 dance
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #4 - November 09, 2014, 09:01 PM

    He was so awesome, and it just seemed right to have him play the Pope in Dogma! Grin

  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #5 - November 09, 2014, 11:26 PM

    My favourite has to be Sean Carroll's total destruction of William Lane Craig.

    The full debate is well over 2 hours long but definitely worth watching. Here's the TL:DW version for those with ADD:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z0TQatmd3s

    More Sean Carroll:
    YouTube - Sean Carroll: God is not a Good Theory
    YouTube - (Meta)Physics: Hans Halvorson and Sean Carroll at Caltech

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #6 - November 10, 2014, 03:16 AM

    Man I forgot how bad Craig got his ass handed to him in that debate. Carroll steamrolled him

    "I moreover believe that any religion that has anything in it that shocks the mind of a child, cannot be a true system."
    -Thomas Paine
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #7 - August 20, 2015, 03:46 AM

    Someone asks Richard Dawkins "What if you're wrong?"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mmskXXetcg

    South Park style animated version. parrot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPJQw-x-xho

    `But I don't want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked.
     `Oh, you can't help that,' said the Cat: `we're all mad here. I'm mad.  You're mad.'
     `How do you know I'm mad?' said Alice.
     `You must be,' said the Cat, `or you wouldn't have come here.'
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #8 - August 21, 2015, 12:35 AM

    My favourite has to be Sean Carroll's total destruction of William Lane Craig.

    The full debate is well over 2 hours long but definitely worth watching. Here's the TL:DW version for those with ADD:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z0TQatmd3s

    More Sean Carroll:
    YouTube - Sean Carroll: God is not a Good Theory
    YouTube - (Meta)Physics: Hans Halvorson and Sean Carroll at Caltech


    Sean Carroll seems to be ignorant of quantum physics. You cannot explain quantum entanglement via nature.
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #9 - August 21, 2015, 12:48 AM

    Apparently Carroll is also ignorant that the sun revolves around the earth so you should really set him straight Ted Roll Eyes

    "I moreover believe that any religion that has anything in it that shocks the mind of a child, cannot be a true system."
    -Thomas Paine
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #10 - August 21, 2015, 08:11 AM

    I await to see your future Nobel Prize in Physics Ted. Oh wait, they give those out to people that are competent and educated in the field. My mistake  Cheesy
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #11 - August 21, 2015, 09:04 AM

    Sean Carroll seems to be ignorant of quantum physics. You cannot explain quantum entanglement via nature.


    According to whom? Last time I checked, quantum physics is a theory of nature.

    "Belief can blunt human reason and common sense, even in learned scholars. What is needed is more impartial study." - Ali Dashti

    https://certainlydoubtful1.wordpress.com/

    https://twitter.com/certainlydoubt1
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #12 - August 21, 2015, 12:30 PM

    So you understand quantum entanglement? I've not been able to google an explanation.

    Maybe you know something that others don't?
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #13 - August 21, 2015, 12:39 PM

    Why on Earth would you expect a professional comedian to not make a mistake about quantum physics?

    `But I don't want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked.
     `Oh, you can't help that,' said the Cat: `we're all mad here. I'm mad.  You're mad.'
     `How do you know I'm mad?' said Alice.
     `You must be,' said the Cat, `or you wouldn't have come here.'
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #14 - September 01, 2015, 03:21 PM

    So you understand quantum entanglement? I've not been able to google an explanation.

    Maybe you know something that others don't?


    My limited understanding of quantum entanglement is as follows: two particles (or systems) which have never physically communicated with each other can both be described by the same physical function.  That is to say, the mathematical translation of their behavior is nothing more than a superposition of their respective histories.  The way physicists seem to make sense of this is instead of considering them as two separate particles with their own histories, it is more tenable to describe them as being part of one, single unitary system sharing a common history.  The so-called enigma of their correlative behavior perhaps, therefore, has less to do with shaky physics and more to do with which conceptual narrative once chooses.

    Personally, I've never really been able to make sense of quantum mechanics as a singular phenomenon.  It has always struck me as an "ensemble statistical" description of nature (e.g. think of gases, bulk liquids, etc.), allowing entire populations of atoms to be surveyed by a single mathematical device.

    "Belief can blunt human reason and common sense, even in learned scholars. What is needed is more impartial study." - Ali Dashti

    https://certainlydoubtful1.wordpress.com/

    https://twitter.com/certainlydoubt1
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #15 - September 01, 2015, 04:28 PM

    Watch "Hell: an excessive punishment" on YouTube
    https://youtu.be/XaL7CkQaQpU
  • The strongest 'atheist' youtube video you've seen ?
     Reply #16 - September 01, 2015, 05:13 PM

    My limited understanding of quantum entanglement is as follows: two particles (or systems) which have never physically communicated with each other can both be described by the same physical function.  That is to say, the mathematical translation of their behavior is nothing more than a superposition of their respective histories.  The way physicists seem to make sense of this is instead of considering them as two separate particles with their own histories, it is more tenable to describe them as being part of one, single unitary system sharing a common history.  The so-called enigma of their correlative behavior perhaps, therefore, has less to do with shaky physics and more to do with which conceptual narrative once chooses.

    Personally, I've never really been able to make sense of quantum mechanics as a singular phenomenon.  It has always struck me as an "ensemble statistical" description of nature (e.g. think of gases, bulk liquids, etc.), allowing entire populations of atoms to be surveyed by a single mathematical device.


    Maybe you can post a video which describes the above. A quick one I saw was https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zD1U1sIPQ4
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »