Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Muslim family in Canada k...
Today at 10:45 AM

Qur'anic studies today
Today at 06:31 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
Yesterday at 07:55 PM

New Britain
Yesterday at 04:35 PM

مدهش----- لماذا؟؟؟؟
by akay
Yesterday at 11:18 AM

dissertation research pro...
June 11, 2021, 10:29 PM

Gaza assault
June 10, 2021, 10:44 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
June 10, 2021, 10:31 PM

NayaPakistan...New Pakist...
June 09, 2021, 02:43 AM

The essence of the facts
by akay
June 08, 2021, 06:43 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
June 06, 2021, 01:06 PM

Pi a new digital crypto c...
by asif
June 04, 2021, 09:27 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Qur'anic studies today

 (Read 750922 times)
  • Previous page 1 ... 340 341 342« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10230 - June 05, 2021, 06:56 PM

    Dr. Javad T Hashmi is a new liberal Muslim theologian and a coming superstar, I believe. He and Dr. Kha Andani seem to more or less openly accept that the Quran isn't Allah's word verbatim, but " inspired".  Does this open up for new tendencies among Muslim researchers and a more open debate about the origins of the Quran?
    Here he is in debate with van Putten about comparing the hadiths with the Quran:

    "I don't think the early period of Qur'anic transmission can be equated to that of Ḥadīth, the latter of which was subject to dramatic & drastic mutation/shift due to the nature of its largely oral transmission. Here are reasons why I think this".

    https://twitter.com/DrJavadTHashmi/status/1401246151077138433?s=20
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10231 - June 05, 2021, 07:09 PM

    Here is another very long twitter thread by Hashmi where he discusses a lot of subjects:

    ....."This is the case whether we take the more accepted view that the Qur'an was first canonized in the era of ʿUthmān (d.656), a mere decades after the Prophet's death, or even the revisionist views of more skeptical scholars like Stephen Shoemaker, who puts it at the end of the seventh century, holding it to be in the early Umayyad rule during the reign of ʿAbd al-Mālik (d.705). As Shoemaker himself concedes, the extreme revisionist position--that puts it at the ninth century--is now dead, due to a number of reasons".....

    "Using the Qur'an as our historically reliable source for the words & thought of Muḥammad (irrespective of whether we think these to be divinely inspired or not!), we can simply compare the two (Qur'an & ḥadīth)."..........

    "Shoemaker writes, "As both Donner and Ayoub observe, Muhammad's apparent failure to designate a clear successor & the Qur'an's silence regarding such matters as political succession are 'most cogently explained' by a primitive Islamic belief that the world would come to an end before such issues could arise: in light of the world's imminent judgment & destruction, 'worrying about long-term leadership...was simply irrelevant'" (Death 178). The promised end was not far in the future, but rather it was on their heads in the now."
    https://twitter.com/DrJavadTHashmi/status/1401023553097584642?s=20

  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10232 - June 05, 2021, 07:36 PM

    Dr. Javad T Hashmi is a new liberal Muslim theologian and a coming superstar, I believe. He and Dr. Kha Andani seem to more or less openly accept that the Quran isn't Allah's word verbatim, but " inspired".  Does this open up for new tendencies among Muslim researchers and a more open debate about the origins of the Quran?

    Why not.
    It just goes against a point settled 1400 years ago which is the base of Muslim theology.

    Quote
    Here he is in debate with van Putten about comparing the hadiths with the Quran:

    "I don't think the early period of Qur'anic transmission can be equated to that of Ḥadīth, the latter of which was subject to dramatic & drastic mutation/shift due to the nature of its largely oral transmission. Here are reasons why I think this".

    https://twitter.com/DrJavadTHashmi/status/1401246151077138433?s=20

    Interesting. Thanks Asbjoern.
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10233 - June 05, 2021, 08:03 PM

    Here is another very long twitter thread by Hashmi where he discusses a lot of subjects:

    ....."This is the case whether we take the more accepted view that the Qur'an was first canonized in the era of ʿUthmān (d.656), a mere decades after the Prophet's death, or even the revisionist views of more skeptical scholars like Stephen Shoemaker, who puts it at the end of the seventh century, holding it to be in the early Umayyad rule during the reign of ʿAbd al-Mālik (d.705). As Shoemaker himself concedes, the extreme revisionist position--that puts it at the ninth century--is now dead, due to a number of reasons".....

    "Using the Qur'an as our historically reliable source for the words & thought of Muḥammad (irrespective of whether we think these to be divinely inspired or not!), we can simply compare the two (Qur'an & ḥadīth)."..........

    "Shoemaker writes, "As both Donner and Ayoub observe, Muhammad's apparent failure to designate a clear successor & the Qur'an's silence regarding such matters as political succession are 'most cogently explained' by a primitive Islamic belief that the world would come to an end before such issues could arise: in light of the world's imminent judgment & destruction, 'worrying about long-term leadership...was simply irrelevant'" (Death 178). The promised end was not far in the future, but rather it was on their heads in the now."
    https://twitter.com/DrJavadTHashmi/status/1401023553097584642?s=20


    There is no 'Muhammad'.
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10234 - June 06, 2021, 07:40 AM

    There is WAS no 'Muhammad'.

      says Altara to Asbjoern1958  post
    Dr. Javad T Hashmi is a new liberal Muslim theologian and a coming superstar, I believe. He and Dr. Kha Andani seem to more or less openly accept that the Quran isn't Allah's word verbatim, but " inspired".  Does this open up for new tendencies among Muslim researchers and a more open debate about the origins of the Quran?
    Here he is in debate with van Putten about comparing the hadiths with the Quran:...........

    https://twitter.com/DrJavadTHashmi/status/1401246151077138433?s=20

    this is what that   Dr Javad Hashmi  says in  one of  his tweets
    Quote

    Dr. Javad T Hashmi @DrJavadTHashmi

     
    Worse yet, the terms "ḥadīth" & "sunna" *are* used in the Qur'an but for very different things. In other words, the Qur'an is worse than oblivious to the Ḥadīth & Sunna. Compare that to ḥadīths themselves, which *will* mention these concepts. 3/


    I wonder where and what verses in Quran mentions/talks about the terms "ḥadīth" & "sunna"?

    I don't think that  fellow  Javad Hashmi reading Quran  ,, he is reading something else

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh5D3HpPVnk

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCP5UesSyWUrnmodUEClJLZA

    Hmm worth watching some of those tubes in the above link

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10235 - June 06, 2021, 01:28 PM

    Oops I missed that one from Altara ..
    I do not understand what you said.

      well I was responding with  some cryptic/obscure  words when I said this dear Altara..
    Quote
    i guess you did not read  the post properly ..  read this again................. .

    Hmm... THAT IS SUCH  A MYSOGENIC STATEMENT FROM YOU   dear Altara.,    and it is because you did not  air the same opinion on a person who happened to be woman as well as Islam's historian ., .....................

     
    Huh??

     


    Well all that was about this post of yours ., 
    Aware of the threats Holland is now a great believer. I do not blame him.

     I was comparing your views on Holland Vs Patricia Crone .,   You are NOT blaming Dr. Holland., because he became a great believer because of threats.... but you did not say same thing   to Late dr. Patricia Crone ...

    that is all what I meant Cheesy   never mind all that stuff..  but Tell me .. Your Views On Prophet of Islam "Muhammad"  .. YOU SAY HE DID NOT EXIST ., and it appears you are right., Question to you..is about the  word "Muhammad:"

    1). Is it a Arabic word?
    2). what are its roots?
    3). It  is clearly an "Adjective"  Muhammad= Praised one  Or  "A GLORIFIED PERSONALITY .,  So  was that word "Muhammad"  was attached to any other name in and Around Arabia  say in the 6th century??

    with best wishes
    yeezevee

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10236 - June 06, 2021, 02:32 PM

    The element that could solve many of these discussions is the carbondating.

    Dye and Shoemaker make it end 7th C to explain the Palestinian influence (cfr Kathisma...). But then that creates new problems bc that is in full fledge Umayyad rule and there are no clear political additions.

    I think it is time to take the c14 results seriously (+/- 630 so redaction of Ur-Quran even earlier), and construct a narrative congruent with these results. At least as a hypothesis.
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10237 - June 06, 2021, 02:39 PM

    Quote
    Well all that was about this post of yours .,
    Quote from: Altara on Yesterday at 08:48 AM
    Aware of the threats Holland is now a great believer. I do not blame him.

     I was comparing your views on Holland Vs Patricia Crone .,   You are NOT blaming Dr. Holland., because he became a great believer because of threats.... but you did not say same thing   to Late dr. Patricia Crone …


    Ok. Atmosphere was not the same.

    Quote
    but Tell me .. Your Views On Prophet of Islam "Muhammad"  .. YOU SAY HE DID NOT EXIST ., and it appears you are right., Question to you..is about the  word "Muhammad:"

    1). Is it a Arabic word?
    2). what are its roots?
    3). It  is clearly an "Adjective"  Muhammad= Praised one  Or  "A GLORIFIED PERSONALITY .,  So  was that word "Muhammad"  was attached to any other name in and Around Arabia  say in the 6th century??


    1/ Yes it is.
    2/ Same as the Hebrew one: hmd : praise, etc.
    3/ 'mu' in Arabic is : 'the one who is/do/make, etc.' Hence 'the one praised'. Cf. S. Dost (Academia is your friend) "AN ARABIAN QUR’ĀN: TOWARDS A THEORY OF PENINSULAR ORIGINS" (2017. p.84.
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10238 - June 06, 2021, 03:09 PM

    The element that could solve many of these discussions is the carbon dating.

    Dye and Shoemaker make it end 7th C to explain the Palestinian influence (cfr Kathisma...). But then that creates new problems bc that is in full fledge Umayyad rule and there are no clear political additions.

    The Kathisma church is built in 450: the pilgrimage starts soon after. All what Dye locate in 650 Palestine (Q,3,5,19, etc.) can be dated earlier and especially elsewhere in the Levant because of the pilgrimage.


    Quote
    I think it is time to take the c14 results seriously (+/- 630 so redaction of Ur-Quran even earlier), and construct a narrative congruent with these results. At least as a hypothesis.


    I consider that the Quranic texts do not come from anything or Apocalyptic stuff (it uses it but that's all). Check the last Dye lecture I gave (if you know French...), he does not give any explanation to the emergence of these texts as if they might have appeared in the 1,2,3,4,5,6 th. c. I do not think they might. There is specific reason(s).
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10239 - June 06, 2021, 03:16 PM

    I listened to Dye and remember he had 4 scenarios. He explained why people like Sinai are wrong in their scenario choice but I didn t hear him saying clearly which scenario he thinks is most probable. Maybe I need to re-listen.
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10240 - June 06, 2021, 04:07 PM

    ..........Dost (Academia is your friend) "AN ARABIAN QUR’ĀN: TOWARDS A THEORY OF PENINSULAR ORIGINS" (2017. p.84..........



    thank you for that reference ... let ,me  read it and let me put that Suleyman  Dost  Thesis pdf file here

    AN ARABIAN QUR’ĀN: TOWARDS A THEORY OF PENINSULAR ORIGINS Pdf file of  Thesis submitted by Suleyman  Dost.. 2017

     

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10241 - June 06, 2021, 07:09 PM

    I listened to Dye and remember he had 4 scenarios. He explained why people like Sinai are wrong in their scenario choice but I didn t hear him saying clearly which scenario he thinks is most probable. Maybe I need to re-listen.

     Dye does not give any explanation in the lecture (except more or less the Apocalyptic tropism) to the emergence of the Quranic texts as if they might have been appeared in the 1,2,3,4,5,6 th. c.  Moreover one should ask him if the emergence of Quranic text could have appeared at those times. I'm curious of his response (if there had one... I think he'd change of topic...)
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10242 - June 06, 2021, 10:23 PM


    .........................

    AN ARABIAN QUR’ĀN: TOWARDS A THEORY OF PENINSULAR ORIGINS[/url] Pdf file of  Thesis submitted by Suleyman  Dost.. 2017

    So dear Altara.. going back to that thesis  of Dost and  casually reading through these pages
    Quote
    State of the Research: “The Etymological Fallacy” 86
    Jāhilī Religious Terms and Practices in the Qur’ān and Epigraphy 95
    Approaching the Divine Properly: From ʿlmqh to al-Raḥmān 102
    ḥmd, “praising God”: 104
    šrk, “associating partners with god”: 112
    nṣr, “divine assistance and victory”: 123
    ʿdhb, “God’s punishment”: 132
    twb, “divine recompense”: 136


    That "hmd"  is  “praising God”:?? Or  “praising  prophet of Islam Muhammad??

    To me it appears some one added stuff in to original Quran Manuscripts.,

    Could it not be possible that the original manuscripts   might have been just short cut stories along with morals & rituals of praying Jewish GD  which comes out of OT  and were in Arabic  but  later the Quranic  authors/compilers of the present book.....  added/modified using Christology along with their  Muhammadology  at a later time?? say some 50/100 years later...

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10243 - June 07, 2021, 11:20 AM

    Altara,

    Before I heard Dye contest early dating of Quran bc he needed a Palestinian milieu for certain surahs (eg 19). Now he was very unclear with his conclusion. You noticed too apparently.
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10244 - June 07, 2021, 03:13 PM

    Each time (orally like in the lecture or in articles) Dye uses the excuse that he does not have time, that it would take too long, that it is a side issue, etc. to avoid giving his opinion on the questions he asks or keys ones. With theses pretexts in hand, he  can afford not to make real conclusions. Moreover, as if by chance, one can constate that he has never written a monography where he would not be able to give theses pretexts to avoid addressing some of these questions.
    The only thing that he wants to talk is his Kathisma Palestinian tropism about  Q,3,5,19, etc. I already said that this tropism is not right because it is not specific to Palestinian mid 7th c. It could be, East Syrian/ North Iraqi/North East Coast Peninsula mid 6th. c. (because of the success of the pilgrimage of the Kathisma whose traditions could have voyaged in these regions) so not being the production of Palestinian literati Arabophone scribes of the 650's.
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10245 - June 10, 2021, 11:45 PM

    Kavad I, Khosrow I and the Wars with the Roman Empire

    In the fall of 502 CE, the sahan sah Kavad I (488 to 531), 1 ruler of the Sasanian Empire,' invaded
    the Roman Empire. Despite the fact that there had previously been growing tensions between
    the two great powers of Late Antiquity,3 this invasion came as a surprise, because in the
    125 years since 377, when the emperor Valens had concluded a treaty (foedus) with the Sasanians,
    armed conflicts between the Romans and Iranians had occurred only very rarely. The
    only time intense fighting took place had been around 420;4 another brief war had ended in
    441 after only a few weeks without any major battles,' while in the sixty years before 502 undisturbed
    peace had prevailed between the Sasanians and the Roman Empire. Tensions and
    conflicts were resolved diplomatically; officials and generals of both empires cooperated at the
    local level," the rulers called each other 'brother',' and envoys were exchanged regularly.8 The
    cultural and economic exchange between Iran and Rome also seems to have intensified noticeably
    during this long period of peace.9 Against this background, the question of why this
    period of peace, from which both empires had profited, ended, is of great relevance, because
    one could argue that the endless wars that the Sasanians and Romans waged against each other
    between 502 and 630 significantly contributed to the fall of pre-Islamic Iran and the end of
    the Ancient World.

    https://www.academia.edu/43443767/Kavad_I_Khosrow_I_and_the_Wars_with_the_Roman_Empire_in_J_Hyland_K_Rezakhani_eds_Brills_Companion_to_War_in_Ancient_Iran_Leiden_Boston_Brill_2022_yet_unpublished_
  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10246 - Yesterday at 08:01 PM

    Thread: https://mobile.twitter.com/PhDniX/status/1403651123492360198
    Quote
    An interesting set of questions which seemed big enough to make a little thread out of it. What can manuscripts tell us in terms of text criticism of the Quran? What can it tell us about the history of the reading traditions? Is it comparable to the bible?

  • Qur'anic studies today
     Reply #10247 - Today at 06:31 AM

    Quote
    At the same time, many manuscripts occur that fall completely out of the system of the 7 (or even the additional 3 canonized later)..I show this with one manuscript (Arabe 334a), which in its system and specific variants does not agree with any canonical reader. As such, the canonical readers tend to cover quite a lot of the variation that was around, but not in the specific configuration we see in many manuscripts.
    On occasion you do find specific variants that are today considered 'non-canonical'.   In the general principles -- the specifications of  phonology and morphology -- we frequently find systems that do not agree with any canonical reading, and this continues until quite late. The Quran of Amajur (ca. 262 AH) has min baʿdihū; Canonical readers all read min baʿdihī.  These kinds of non-canonical systems of general principles are quite frequent and the present a rather interesting picture of the pre-canonical period of reading: people were clearly experimenting with different options, and that was considered to be fine.   A study that would include other features or a combination of features is no doubt going to find many more of these. Thus, a very large portion of the manuscripts in the pre-canonization period showed deviations from the canonical seven and ten.  These manuscripts are not likely to contain world-shocking readings that will totally overturn the way we understand the text. But they tell us a lot about the performance art and freedom reciters had in this period, which also reveals things about the process of canonization.


    It is perfectly normal, as there is no 'oral' tradition but a textual (with the rasm)  one. Nothing surprising/amazing here. Each literati deciphered the rasm in his own way and transmitted it as being the 'good' one.
  • Previous page 1 ... 340 341 342« Previous thread | Next thread »