again this goes back to my comment just because someone saw something for real but had no evidence for it doesn't mean he didn't saw it so your demand for objective evidence fall apart the only way you can refute this is to prove he was delusional which no one tell today was able to achieve that
This is not justification for 100% acceptance of an idea. An idea must stand on it's own merit. To do so otherwise one can claim 100% justification for anything they want. If one can not justify their claims there is no reason to accept the claim
again back into my comment just because someone saw something and had no evidence to back it up doesn't mean it didn't happen he just didn't have the means and the tools to backup his evidence now as for paranormal look around you ghost sittings and many many people who lived in houses that they thought was ok yet it turned out to be hunted and they brought there story one of these stories was brought into a movie called the conjuring Google it it's based on actuall life evidence we have UFO sittings all over the world and many many more more than enough to fill this thread
See above.
how can you fool yourself if you know you are not delusional if you made tests on your brain and turned out that you are not delusional yet you saw a UFO can you blame yourself again
A person testing themselves in order to conclude if they are not delusional can and will fail. If one is already delusional but unaware of it no amount of self-tests will produce an objective view they are not delusional. I have seen and interacted with delusional people. There is no reasoning with them as their perception of reality and thinking processes are already faulty. It is not until external methods are applied in conjunction with self-evaluation can one conclude if any experience was due to an delusion or not. Even these methods can fail to reintegrate a person with objective reality. Also many cases will require life long treatment in order to maintain a non-delusional state.
look around you there is enough paranormal evidence even enough to make atheists out there make a new branch of atheism called atheism+ where they believe in supernatural but they still don't believe in a god
Evidence such as? I looked around but fail to find evidence.
Quantum mechanics falls of the idea something come from something QM is about he movement of the electrons or the atoms in boddys in space so saying something come from NOTHING (zero no matter nata) is not a normal thing we haven't absorbed it at all no one till today have ever successfully showed something come from nothing so?? then we are left with one explanation for it that it's supernatural
A failure to provide an answer does not make an asserted answer defacto correct.
NO absolutely not the only one single incident you have is when he thought he had sex with his wife yet he didn't and guess what made him think that?? a magic was worked on him NOT schizophrenia your logic dictate there is no evidence that he saw an angel yet there is no evidence that he had schizophrenia all along there so no evidence for epliplsy and so on yes people called him mad man but that doesn't mean he had schizophrenia you can be mad and not have schizophrenia schizophrenia is again a split of personality Muhammad didn't show any symptoms for it again if he had schizophrenia he will not be able to survive your hypothesis fall apart
You are asserting magic without having proven magic
(you said there is no empirical evidence that Muhammad saw an angel right? will there is no empirical evidence that he had any mental illness or schizophrenia on the other hand
Excuse me Where did I say "there's no emperical evidence Mohammed never saw an angel", I haven't even used the word "emperical" in this thread. I spoke of corroborative testimones ! Please don't lie and say I said things I never did, people can scroll back and actually read what people have said. Don't make up things people have said, this is very disingenous.
yes but we have biographies of the prophet any mental disorder will have been academically accepted Muslims would have belived it yet we see many many times if the prophet was schizophrenic he will never be able to talk normally or even understand people never yet we see him 99% of the time answering people question and making statements to people and realize reality if he was schizophrenic he would have been killed easly in battles because he won;t be able to see reality and he would have killed one of his soldiers thinking he was the enemy YET we see no evidence for that the one one you have is about him having magic worked on him yet we see academic don't say that the only evidence of a mental disorder you have on hims is epilepsy which i showed can't be applied on Muhammad just because we understand it today doesn't mean you will unfairly and blindly apply it on people in the past without evidence for that just for the fact we hate them
You are making sweeping claims without evidence.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/diary-of-a-high-function/ A functional schizophrenic with a degree from Yale.
Topic: New member (Muslim not Ex-muslim) joining the gang can i get huge welcome ?