Yeah I've just been looking at that. For example, regarding New Zealand:
Furthermore, a Religious Libel law remains on the statute books: Section 123 of the Crimes Act 1961 criminalizes “blasphemous libel” with a maximum sentence of one year. There is no record of a successful prosecution under this law.
So although the map on the site claims "severe discrimination" and prison sentences for blasphemy, in practice it aint gonna happen.
From my perspective, the most worrying thing in Australia currently is the channeling of government funding to religiously-based schools that teach a crippled and/or idiotic curriculum. Apart from that, it's most pretty trivial issues that in practice have little or no effect. The "highlighted case" from Victoria was an example that frankly would probably not have passed on this forum either, IIRC. Basically, Geller types nutting off about Islam. Criticism per se would be highly unlikely to result in prosecution.
Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West.