'Threatened with a gun? Well that's a misleading report if ever there was one
. IIRC no one threatened her
with a gun and you would have to be pretty fucking stupid to think someone would actually shoot themselves for a trivial thing in a chatroom. And if i further recall, that particular member was attacking people within a minute of joining the chan, continually took offence over non-existent slights on the forum and finally disappeared after you smited her for responding to a tongue smiley with a demand for someone to kill themselves and their father.
To be honest I don't even remember the girl beyond that one incident, but whether she was directly threatened with a gun, or told a member would "kill themselves" with his gun, if she didn't confess to being me, a gun was still involved and that is still threatening and intimidating behaviour.
She may have gone on to be a twat, but that incident still stands out.
Ok, I seriously have no recollection of this whatsover, so I can't comment on the legitimacy or context of it, but I will say that I do recall one incident months and months ago where I may have made a regular female member of chat feel uncomfortable with sleaze, so I don't begrudge you pointing the finger at me, I have no defence (for what it's worth though, I apologised unprompted, was told no offence was taken and made an, I think successful, effort not to do that again). But again I don't think that sort of sleaze is any more prevalent than it is on the forum.
It's not you I was referring to as it happens, and I can comment on its legitimacy, especially since it was a friend of mine.
I don't see you as sleazy, I'm sure you can be, we all can be, but I haven't see you go after a newb before. You are actually far more welcoming up there, and when I was going after newbs, you would ensure they were taken seriously.
So cool defence, but ultimately not needed.
One incident does not make a trend, the vast majority of non-trolls, especially muslim noobs who wouldn't be given a chance to sit down on the forum, are treated more than amicably, and engaged far better than they are on the forum.
Not from what I remember. Which member was it who had his IP address hidden, was harangued and harrassed over it?
How is that any better than how we treat our suspected trolls?
As opposed to being allowed to change your name to 'dick hymen' for weeks/months on here, admin-sanctioned no less?
When has my name on here been dick hymen?
This is so far beyond retarded I don't even know where to start. Well firstly, I didn't, nor did anyone else, say 'someone like aphro', I said aphrodite. Your attempt to make this seem like an attack on any group of people rather a particular person is what's funny. Secondly, and please explain to me how you've managed this piece of brain-dead fuckery, despite everyone else clearly understanding it was ironic because a serial offender was complaining about the offence, you've somehow extrapolated that to include her gender, and insinuated that I was some sort of sexist, just because you can't see beyond her vagina, when there is no possible way I could make the particular point I did to a male or female with any less reference to gender than I did.
Perhaps you shouldn't have started then, since you belief my comment was retarded means you went on to sound certainly no less retarded yourself.
This is not a gender comment, I would repeat to you "how did you manage to get that piece of brain dead fuckery out of you" to suggest I don't believe a man can also be sleazed out even when he is sleazy himself?
Anti feminist defence mechanism?
My statement stands, her being a big offender, does not make her complaint any less valid.
A gay slut who (<<see a man) who complains of being sexually harrasses is not any less a victim just because in the rest of his life, he is a male fucking slut.