... only that I am not aware of him being intentionally dishonest.
Neither am I.
That's the thing - he is not intentionally dishonest. He is simply unprincipled when it comes to judging Islam by the standards he uses to judge other systems because of his beliefs. Have you ever seen him criticizing Islamic imperialism? Have you ever seen Zia Sardad criticizing it? Me neither.
Such dichotomy is understandable when it comes to your average grandam in Kazakhstan but much less so when prominent intellectual such as Tariq Ramdan are concerned. I simply hold him to a much higher standards then I would an ordinary person.
And I'm sorry, but I take exception to: "mainstream, standard, bigoted, supremacist and tribalistic version of Islam"
That's not a "version" of Islam - that's Islam. That's Islam. Have you read the Qur'an?
It is a 'version' of Islam. A literalist one. My 'Islam' was completely different. And yeah, of course I have read the Quran.
It doesn't mean those who follow it are bigoted, tribalistic or supremacists - and it doesn't mean Islam doesn't contain other elements too.
Precisely!
That's why I wrote that criticizing somebody's viewpoint does not equate to hating that particular individual as a person. Individuals are sometimes compelled into doing stupid things and subscribing to dangerous ideas because of societal in-group pressures regardless of the fact that such ideas do not really reflect who they are.
But if you dislike Tarek Ramadan for holding such views then as I say you must dislike the vast majority of Muslims. Because that's their religion.
Again, I hold him to a much higher standards then I would an ordinary believer. He is an extremely prominent public intellectual.
Do you think there are Muslims who believe in another Qur'an? Another set of hadeeths?
There are those who interpret them in a truly progressive manner, yes. Like The tailor. Or my former me.
But why dislike or attack the person for believing what they say they believe? Why accuse him of being a two-faced bastard.
Okay, he is a snake oil salesman. But like I said the analysis Caroline Fourest did on him shows him in a light that is incompatible with a position of 'Martin Luther King of Islam'.
Not heard of her or read what she said about him. Link?
There is lots of stuff on youtube. Most of it is unfortunately in French.
So did I.
Does that make you and I two-faced bastards?
I strictly separate ordinary individuals who hold personal beliefs from prominent public ideologues and intellectuals who should have know better and apply the same rigorous standard of inquiry to all ideologies.