Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →
↑ ↓
CEMB → Forum → Life, The Universe & Everything → Religions and Gods → Atheist Censorship

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
April 28, 2024, 06:41 AM
Lights on the way
by akay
April 27, 2024, 01:26 PM
New Britain
April 27, 2024, 08:42 AM
What's happened to the fo...
April 27, 2024, 08:30 AM
Qur'anic studies today
April 23, 2024, 02:50 AM
Do humans have needed kno...
April 20, 2024, 08:02 AM
Do humans have needed kno...
April 19, 2024, 12:17 AM
Iran launches drones
April 13, 2024, 05:56 PM
عيد مبارك للجميع! ^_^
by akay
April 12, 2024, 12:01 PM
Eid-Al-Fitr
by akay
April 12, 2024, 08:06 AM
Mock Them and Move on., ...
January 30, 2024, 05:44 AM
Pro Israel or Pro Palesti...
January 29, 2024, 08:53 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Atheist Censorship

 (Read 40949 times)
  • 12 3 ... 14 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Atheist Censorship
     OP - April 14, 2011, 11:56 AM
    This guy is a theist and he got the boot from Dawkins' website for calling him on his chickening out of debating William Lane Craig. Even 'rational' people censor views they don't like, it would seem.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYKc54E1eMg&feature=feedf
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #1 - April 14, 2011, 12:00 PM
    Quote
    chickening out of debating William Lane Craig

    Indeed, like how a physicist chickens out of debating an astrologer.
    Against the ruin of the world, there
    is only one defense: the creative act.

    -- Kenneth Rexroth
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #2 - April 14, 2011, 12:09 PM
    Quote from: arX on April 14, 2011, 12:00 PM
    Indeed, like how a physicist chickens out of debating an astrologer.


    He's debated John Lennox more than once, Alister McGrath, a bishop, even Ted Haggard! Why won't he debate Craig despite being asked to several times? Because he knows he'd lose. Hitchens may have lost to WLC but at least he had the courage of his convictions to do it.

    And WLC may be a sophist, but he does present some sophisticated arguments, and he's certainly more nuanced in his argumentation than Dawkins is.
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #3 - April 14, 2011, 12:10 PM
    Dawkins has a long standing policy of not debating various sorts of wackos. "Calling him out" on this would obviously be seen as pointless trolling and spamming. Kicking someone for that is not quite the same as censorship.
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #4 - April 14, 2011, 12:11 PM
    I agree about booting out theists from popular atheist sites to keep the things clean and readable for someone who wants to read atheist information.
    Admin of following facebook pages and groups:
    Islam's Last Stand (page)
    Islam's Last Stand (group)
    and many others...
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #5 - April 14, 2011, 12:13 PM
    When did Dawkins ever "debate" Ted Haggard?  I know he interviewed him, I don't recall any debate being held between them.   Roll Eyes
    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #6 - April 14, 2011, 12:16 PM
    What is even the point of these public debates?  Huh?
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #7 - April 14, 2011, 12:18 PM
    It's one of the few things muppets like Craig have to advance their cause in an increasingly rational age.
    Against the ruin of the world, there
    is only one defense: the creative act.

    -- Kenneth Rexroth
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #8 - April 14, 2011, 12:20 PM
    It's also a long standing tactic of various religious nuts to rock up at atheist sites and make as much pointless noise as possible for as long as they can, with the full expectation of being booted for it, just so they can then go and bleat about being censored or persecuted. It's called "witnessing".
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #9 - April 14, 2011, 12:21 PM
    Yeah, substantial arguments don't win you public debates, showmanship does. Hence Zakir Naik.
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #10 - April 14, 2011, 12:33 PM
    That being said he I think there is a difference between censoring legitimate claims such as if the argument of an infinite regress was presented and it was deleted and if someone shows up to call dawkins a chicken.  They aren't the same thing.  I would fully expect to get booted from a Christian board if I called Jesus a faggot who enjoyed anal sex with the apostles or Muhammad a child raping serial killer on a Muslim board. The differences is that both rational arguments and pedantic arguments get censored on religious forums. That being said in general I think its a bad idea to censor but it should be at the discretion of the board operators to make the site runs smoothly.  It's a thin line to walk.
    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #11 - April 14, 2011, 12:38 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 14, 2011, 12:10 PM
    Dawkins has a long standing policy of not debating various sorts of wackos. "Calling him out" on this would obviously be seen as pointless trolling and spamming. Kicking someone for that is not quite the same as censorship.


    WLC may be a typical apologist, but he's not a wacko, certainly no more a wacko than other people Dawkins has given the time of day to. Yet, when asked to debate him, he claims not to have the time. It's not really surprising that some people are led to believe he's being evasive.

    And there's nothing wrong with criticising someone for refusing to take on the more difficult arguments and opponents on the other side. It hardly constitutes 'trolling,' ill-defined though that term may be. And of course kicking someone for spamming and trolling is one thing, kicking them for merely criticising someone is another altogether.
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #12 - April 14, 2011, 12:40 PM
    Quote
    When did Dawkins ever "debate" Ted Haggard?  I know he interviewed him, I don't recall any debate being held between them.   


    Granted, not a formal debate. But he did seem to find time for a discussion with him, despite his being a young-earth creationist crackpot. Craig is not, so why hasn't he the time to discuss with him?
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #13 - April 14, 2011, 12:41 PM
    @Deusvult

    Yes, they have a  right to censor what they want on their own board and so on, but I hardly think this guy went so far as to say stuff like that. That and, since secularists claim to be so pro-free expression you'd think they'd have tougher skin about such things.
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #14 - April 14, 2011, 12:42 PM
    Kicking him out, So what?

    He didn't delete the comment apparently. So it's not censorship, it's cleansing the site.

    This dude, however well expressed he is, opted to argue the lack of a debate when he could have mimicked Dr.Craigs argument and gotten his point through, if he actually had a point to make. Why's he surprised he's not taken seriously.

    Ps. Funny Observation.He referred to  Craig as Craig, then goes on to criticize Dawkins for calling him Mr Craig.
    "Tomorrow is the today you were worried about yesterday" Unknown
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #15 - April 14, 2011, 12:43 PM
    Quote from: arX on April 14, 2011, 12:18 PM
    It's one of the few things muppets like Craig have to advance their cause in an increasingly rational age.


    Increasing atheism and secularism does not equate to an increase in rationality.
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #16 - April 14, 2011, 12:45 PM
    @Mufasa

    They still silenced him, and for nothing more than expressing ideas that they didn't like.
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #17 - April 14, 2011, 12:48 PM
    I don't know why this is surprising to anyone. They regularly censored people when RD.net was a legit forum, and then they basically trashed the forum without consulting anyone and rebuilt the site to where it no longer had a true discussion forum component. Pretty obvious the people who run the site don't care much for open debate and discussion there.
    fuck you
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #18 - April 14, 2011, 12:51 PM
    Quote from: Zebedee on April 14, 2011, 12:43 PM
    Increasing atheism and secularism does not equate to an increase in rationality.

    Increase in atheism = lack of one more unsubstantiated belief in a world full of unsubstantiated beliefs.

    Increase in secularism = relatively greater freedom to believe whatever you want without imposing it on everyone else.

    I would conclude that such increases are positively correlated with rationality.
    Against the ruin of the world, there
    is only one defense: the creative act.

    -- Kenneth Rexroth
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #19 - April 14, 2011, 01:03 PM
    which are the big atheist forums these days?
    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #20 - April 14, 2011, 02:06 PM
    Look at my youtube profile, i have a list of links to them.
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #21 - April 14, 2011, 02:13 PM
    Thanks, which of these are the biggest ones? I might take a look later..

    Quote
    RICHARD DAWKINS COMMENTS ABOUT OUR CHANNEL:
    http://richarddawkins.net/d...

    LEAGUE OF REASON FORUM:
    http://www.leagueofreason.c...

    JAMES RANDI FORUM:
    http://forums.randi.org/for...

    THE THINKING ATHEIST FORUM:
    http://thethinkingatheist.c...

    THE ATHEIST FOUNDATION FORUM:
    http://www.atheistfoundatio...

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #22 - April 14, 2011, 02:35 PM
    There's also:

    http://rationalia.com/forum/

    http://www.rationalskepticism.org/

    http://www.atheistnexus.org/forum

    http://www.samharris.org/forum

    http://www.skepticforum.com/index.php

    http://the-brights.net/forums/forum/

    http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/2732/atheism (closed now but you can download all the questions and answers)
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #23 - April 14, 2011, 03:43 PM
    I don't get why William Lane Craig is rated so highly. I must be missing something.
    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #24 - April 14, 2011, 03:44 PM
    Quote from: Zebedee on April 14, 2011, 12:41 PM
    @Deusvult

    Yes, they have a  right to censor what they want on their own board and so on, but I hardly think this guy went so far as to say stuff like that. That and, since secularists claim to be so pro-free expression you'd think they'd have tougher skin about such things.

     probably not and the forum probably deleted the thread out of some kind of bias towards affirmation and an aversion towards negative opinions.   On a nitty side secularists can range from totalitarian to free speech anarchists.  If you mean the general western approach to secularism I would more or less agree and think they should probably more thick skinned and less quick to delete.
    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #25 - April 14, 2011, 03:48 PM
    Quote from: Ishina on April 14, 2011, 03:43 PM
    I don't get why William Lane Craig is rated so highly. I must be missing something.

     he is a " good debater" ( though some of his debate techniques are cheap shots) in the sense that he seems articulate, stays on topic, and has a " commanding " presence. He generally knows what he is talking about and approaches from more of an academic tone of rhetoric than a red neck Christian pastor.  That being said the actual things he says, the actual substance of his arguments are normally fallacious or a weasel wordy way to get out of things.
    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #26 - April 14, 2011, 03:50 PM
    Yeah, he's a definitely a master debater.
    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #27 - April 14, 2011, 03:52 PM
    Come again?
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #28 - April 14, 2011, 03:54 PM
    Yes
    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • Re: Atheist Censorship
     Reply #29 - April 14, 2011, 03:59 PM
    That was the title of the trophy our debate team gave away to the debater who was awarded the most points.
    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • 12 3 ... 14 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »