Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →
↑ ↓
CEMB → Forum → Feedback and Resources → Questions? Problems? Suggestions? → Cokerface restriction

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
Today at 12:50 PM
Do humans have needed kno...
Today at 04:17 AM
Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Yesterday at 07:11 PM
What's happened to the fo...
by zeca
Yesterday at 06:39 PM
New Britain
Yesterday at 05:41 PM
Do humans have needed kno...
Yesterday at 05:47 AM
Iran launches drones
April 13, 2024, 09:56 PM
عيد مبارك للجميع! ^_^
by akay
April 12, 2024, 04:01 PM
Eid-Al-Fitr
by akay
April 12, 2024, 12:06 PM
Lights on the way
by akay
February 01, 2024, 12:10 PM
Mock Them and Move on., ...
January 30, 2024, 10:44 AM
Pro Israel or Pro Palesti...
January 29, 2024, 01:53 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Cokerface restriction

 (Read 4338 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Cokerface restriction
     OP - February 25, 2011, 05:15 PM
    What is the basis for this? I can only assume it was his attacks on ALM, but isn't a warning normally issued prior to restriction for personal attacks?
    fuck you
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #1 - February 25, 2011, 09:36 PM
    Turns out he is a previously banned member using a sock puppet. We hadn't bothered checking in detail before, but Cheetah did once he started trolling. We'll review both accounts and decide what to do about it. The restriction may not be permanent, but I don't mind if he has to cool it overnight. Smiley
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #2 - February 25, 2011, 09:39 PM
    Interesting. Who?

    And it didn't seem like he was trolling to me as much as he genuinely thought ALM was racist.
    fuck you
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #3 - February 25, 2011, 09:42 PM
    Are you kidding me, Q-man? How did I give him that impression? Tell me. My impression was that 50% of his posts (not only addressed to me) were attempts to annoy. I don't mind if he has to cool it over 3 nights LOL
    "That it is indeed the speech of an illustrious messenger" (The Koran 69:40)
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #4 - February 25, 2011, 09:44 PM
    More importantly - why was my thread locked??? Unlock it.
    "That it is indeed the speech of an illustrious messenger" (The Koran 69:40)
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #5 - February 25, 2011, 10:14 PM
    Quote from: Alex Lam Meem on February 25, 2011, 09:44 PM
    Could someone please explain why my thread was locked? If someone would be kind enough to unlock it, I promise to be a very good boy from now on.

    ftfy
    Each of us a failed state in stark relief against the backdrop of the perfect worlds we seek.
    Propagandhi - Failed States
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #6 - February 25, 2011, 10:15 PM
    Quote from: Alex Lam Meem on February 25, 2011, 09:42 PM
    Are you kidding me, Q-man? How did I give him that impression? Tell me.


    I dunno, but I think you did.

    Quote
    My impression was that 50% of his posts (not only addressed to me) were attempts to annoy. I don't mind if he has to cool it over 3 nights LOL


    You been doin some fair trollin of your own.

    Quote from: Alex Lam Meem on February 25, 2011, 09:44 PM
    More importantly - why was my thread locked??? Unlock it.


    Please create a separate thread for that topic.
    fuck you
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #7 - February 25, 2011, 10:21 PM
    You "dunno"? How is making claims denigrating someone, when you can't back it up, not trolling?

    I certainly have not done any trolling myself with one exception: exposing ahmad2010. If you were referring to anything else, then you misunderstood my intentions.
    "That it is indeed the speech of an illustrious messenger" (The Koran 69:40)
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #8 - February 25, 2011, 10:23 PM
    ALM, I have no desire to debate the issue with you, I was just asking the staff's justification for doing so, which was apparently sock-puppetry.
    fuck you
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #9 - February 25, 2011, 10:26 PM
    Then stop accusing me of imaginary nonsense. You got your answer, end of story.
    "That it is indeed the speech of an illustrious messenger" (The Koran 69:40)
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #10 - February 25, 2011, 10:28 PM
     Roll Eyes
    fuck you
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #11 - February 25, 2011, 10:32 PM
    ....I have a can of Lilt here (Didn't know they still made it)....


    LOL!
    Change of subject FTW
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #12 - February 25, 2011, 11:20 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on February 25, 2011, 09:36 PM
    Turns out he is a previously banned member using a sock puppet. We hadn't bothered checking in detail before, but Cheetah did once he started trolling.

    Is he DigDug?
    "Life is not a matter of holding good cards, but of playing a poor hand well."
    - Robert Louis Stevenson
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #13 - February 25, 2011, 11:31 PM
    No way. They woulda permabanned him if it was.
    fuck you
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #14 - February 25, 2011, 11:35 PM
    not necessarily, also depends on how sure they were
    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #15 - February 25, 2011, 11:36 PM
    What Q said. Smiley
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #16 - February 25, 2011, 11:57 PM
    Since we're guessing, my guess is someone whose name ends in o. Do I get a prize?
    "That it is indeed the speech of an illustrious messenger" (The Koran 69:40)
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #17 - February 26, 2011, 12:14 AM
    I find it useful to refer to this exchange when dealing with Pokerface. Call it a template in how to put down ill-written and ill-argued posts. Our friend put me on his ignore list shortly after that and before the day was out, unable to keep away from the Hairy Turk, took me off his list again and then after sending me a bunch of lurid private messages put me back on his list when I asked him to spread his cheeks for me. A very unstable character as you can see. But do be gentle with him. I still have a lingering affection for the kid. How can I not?  Let him back in.
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #18 - February 26, 2011, 09:44 AM
    Quote
    Unlock it.


    Keep your hair on.  I just locked it temporarily so people could cool off and not respond to the troll.  There's no point in responding to him anyway, he's gone, (for now at least).  Just keep to the topic of the thread.
    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Cokerface restriction
     Reply #19 - February 26, 2011, 02:15 PM
    Thank you  Smiley
    "That it is indeed the speech of an illustrious messenger" (The Koran 69:40)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »