debunker, thanks for your kind words mate

I could well be wrong and deluded about Mehdi, and I'm ready to be called out for it if so. No shame in extending a sympathetic imagination to him and turning out to be wrong, I'll take that. He might have changed. He is in a position of some influence now, being a senior editor at The New Statesman and being called upon to write for national newspapers and appear on TV. He does need to account for his words.
Its the parts of his speech at 3 mins 29 seconds and 4 mins 20 seconds that are really obnoxious and disturbing. And I had not see the rant that starts at 6 minutes 30 seconds, but LoL'd when he included in the litany of hateful things that Yazid was, that he was 'a tyrant, a killer, a drunkard, a dog lover, a music lover......a homosexual, a paedophile, a sexual deviant'
Being a dog lover and a music lover, on the same level as being a killer and a paedophile!
OK, to be frank, whatever sympathy I might have had for Mehdi should be contingent on him explaining himself. He needs to account for his rants. This stuff is just demented.
It almost beggars belief that someone could be so two faced and deceitful, and that he could get away with it having such a high profile in the media recently, and that he could be associated with the Left, and what was once the house publication of the progressive Left in the UK. Or really is he just so overwhelmed by cognitive dissonance that he exists in some kind of parallel universe, seeing no breach between these rants and what he claims to stand for elsewhere?
How do you read him, debunker?