Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Qur'anic studies today
Yesterday at 06:50 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
April 20, 2024, 12:02 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
April 19, 2024, 04:40 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
April 19, 2024, 12:50 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
April 19, 2024, 04:17 AM

What's happened to the fo...
by zeca
April 18, 2024, 06:39 PM

New Britain
April 18, 2024, 05:41 PM

Iran launches drones
April 13, 2024, 09:56 PM

عيد مبارك للجميع! ^_^
by akay
April 12, 2024, 04:01 PM

Eid-Al-Fitr
by akay
April 12, 2024, 12:06 PM

Mock Them and Move on., ...
January 30, 2024, 10:44 AM

Pro Israel or Pro Palesti...
January 29, 2024, 01:53 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Leading Scientists surveyed in 1998 only 7% believe in God

 (Read 2397 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Leading Scientists surveyed in 1998 only 7% believe in God
     OP - January 13, 2011, 04:30 AM

    It shits me to tears when muslims and christians tell lies by claiming their dusty old books contain science or even make absurd claims like science supports what is written in these books.

    A survey was done with the members of the National Academy of Sciences in 1998 they also have results for 1914 and 1933.

    1998
    Personal Belief  7%
    Personal Disbelief  72.2%
    Doubt or Agnosticism  20.8%


    1914  27.7% had belief in God
    1933  15%  had belief in God
    1998   7% had belief in God
    2011  -  ?

    Read the link for more  send him a email if you need more evidence.
    http://stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news/file002.html

  • Re: Leading Scientists surveyed in 1998 only 7% believe in God
     Reply #1 - January 13, 2011, 04:54 AM

    so are scientists the new priest class?

    At evening, casual flocks of pigeons make
    Ambiguous undulations as they sink,
    Downward to darkness, on extended wings. - Stevens
  • Re: Leading Scientists surveyed in 1998 only 7% believe in God
     Reply #2 - January 13, 2011, 05:05 AM

    You could go one step further than priest and say Stephen Hawking is a prophet. He accurately predicts the nature of the universe from his reading and interpretation of current knowledge.

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • Re: Leading Scientists surveyed in 1998 only 7% believe in God
     Reply #3 - January 13, 2011, 05:21 AM

    so are scientists the new priest class?


    No

    I was just pointing out the high levels of disbelief in the scientific community.

  • Re: Leading Scientists surveyed in 1998 only 7% believe in God
     Reply #4 - January 13, 2011, 05:43 AM

    Project Steve:

    Quote
    NCSE's "Project Steve" is a tongue-in-cheek parody of a long-standing creationist tradition of amassing lists of "scientists who doubt evolution" or "scientists who dissent from Darwinism."

    Creationists draw up these lists to try to convince the public that evolution is somehow being rejected by scientists, that it is a "theory in crisis." Not everyone realizes that this claim is unfounded. NCSE has been asked numerous times to compile a list of thousands of scientists affirming the validity of the theory of evolution. Although we easily could have done so, we have resisted. We did not wish to mislead the public into thinking that scientific issues are decided by who has the longer list of scientists!

    Project Steve pokes fun at this practice and, because "Steves" are only about 1% of scientists, it also makes the point that tens of thousands of scientists support evolution. And it honors the late Stephen Jay Gould, evolutionary biologist, NCSE supporter, and friend.

    We'd like to think that after Project Steve, we'll have seen the last of bogus "scientists doubting evolution" lists, but it's probably too much to ask. We hope that when such lists are proposed, reporters and other citizens will ask, "How many Steves are on your list!?"

    The statement:

    Evolution is a vital, well-supported, unifying principle of the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence. It is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools.


    It's worth noting that as of Dec 2010, 1151 Steves have signed the list.

    And as of Jan 2011, just over 800 people have signed the Dissent from Darwin list...

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »