I heard that if we were to remove all the space in the universe, then it could be compressed into the size of a sugar cube.
I know atoms are by & large made of space, but is this a gross exaggeration, or true?
Well science currently tells us, that not all that simply is, is "space", that there are parts of the atom, which compose the atoms as such, even though "space" fill these parts mostly. So spaces are contained within spaces, as such and they are not pure spaces.
There is always something being involved. Whether it actually not being 'out there' but still 'within' us or it being our very essence. And you can't deny this. Because its the very essence of the person denying it. [I'm starting to bring in Hinduism]
Even if the world, as we see it, is taken for granted seemingly, and that our eyes obscure the hidden reality. Still does not negate the experience that I have - in the moment of experience, and my [although imperfect] memory remembering it. Well my recollection of it by attempting to remember is the one that is imperfect not my faculty that stores the memory.
One thing leads to another, having gone there to the current place, it seems what once was before, when it
was- though seemingly complete it may have been- was but not complete.
Its interesting because of cognitive dissonance.
But that does not mean the current place, is like previously now complete(-being all that there is to it). Because it is only
seemingly.Remember things always seemingly were compete, because they are
convincing.
The boundaries get smashed, and this offers new [possible]insight but the seemingness never loses itself.