Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Today at 02:08 PM

the lost road
Yesterday at 09:25 PM

Paris murder
Yesterday at 02:46 PM

NayaPakistan...New Pakist...
Yesterday at 12:39 PM

Pakistan: The Nation.....
Yesterday at 05:43 AM

Discord Group for Ex-Musl...
November 28, 2020, 10:51 PM

Shit Muslims Say To Ex-Mu...
November 27, 2020, 01:06 PM

The essence of the facts
November 27, 2020, 12:56 PM

Orientalism - Edward Said
by zeca
November 25, 2020, 07:35 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
November 25, 2020, 05:20 PM

مدهش----- لماذا؟؟؟؟
by akay
November 25, 2020, 12:38 PM

A teenage Pure Muslim kil...
November 23, 2020, 09:33 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Problem with image rollovers

 (Read 683 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Problem with image rollovers
     OP - August 07, 2010, 07:54 PM

    Used this but wasn't successful:

    [IMGROLL=Value] Rollover image url [/IMGROLL]

    Yet! a roll over image is shown in the sidebar!



    The World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.
                                   Thomas Paine

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored !- Aldous Huxley
  • Re: Problem with image rollovers
     Reply #1 - August 08, 2010, 04:11 AM

    What the effin' hell is [IMGROLL] ?  Huh?  I've never seen or heard of that tag in my life. BBC allows you to link images but doesn't allow for any fancy stuff.

    That image in the sidebar is custom coded with html and javascript. Actually I could drop the js and just do it with CSS but I coded that block ages ago when I didn't know any better. I'll get around to changing it sometime.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Problem with image rollovers
     Reply #2 - August 09, 2010, 10:46 AM

    < could try that, or was it not what you wanted to do?
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »