Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
Today at 05:36 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
Today at 02:11 PM

NayaPakistan...New Pakist...
Today at 11:42 AM

Reading stabbings
Yesterday at 10:32 PM

Coronavirus crisis
Yesterday at 12:20 PM

Qur'anic studies today
January 12, 2021, 03:05 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
January 12, 2021, 11:42 AM

Hello
January 09, 2021, 07:46 AM

Paris murder
January 08, 2021, 07:50 PM

Freely down loadable Boo...
January 07, 2021, 03:21 AM

The Lady of the Heaven., ...
January 04, 2021, 05:10 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
January 01, 2021, 10:01 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Comments on Debunker and IA debate

 (Read 41429 times)
  • 12 3 ... 11 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     OP - June 26, 2010, 08:26 PM

    Comments here.
  • Re: Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #1 - June 26, 2010, 08:32 PM

    Now since this is in the Exclusive rooms, I have the right to ask you to BUZZ OFF!

    Please mods, take him out of this thread!

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #2 - June 26, 2010, 08:34 PM

    @ IA

    Ok, so let's concentrate on this. If He shown Himself then you will be forced to believe, right?

    I'm not sure if that's your question? Are you asking why doesn't He force us to believe? Because showing Himself is as good as forcing you to believe.



    This is incorrect. I can choose to believe even after I see a miracle. Even after God shows himself. It won't change the neurons in my brain. You could say it would be stupid, foolish etc, and people had a choice before and still choose to disbelieve. But there are people that believed as well when miracles were made.

    So no, do not agree.
  • Re: Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #3 - June 26, 2010, 08:41 PM

    Now since this is in the Exclusive rooms, I have the right to ask you to BUZZ OFF!

    Please mods, take him out of this thread!


    That would not be free speech.  Seriously, if I am barred from a conversation on a public forum I will leave.  I mean it.  Not because I give a damn about your crappy thread, but because I refuse to be singled out.

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #4 - June 26, 2010, 08:42 PM

    Hey, idiot! This is the Exclusive Rooms! Buzz off, already!

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #5 - June 26, 2010, 08:45 PM

    Tell me to buzz off all you like, I won't be singled out for censorship.  Sorry.

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #6 - June 26, 2010, 08:45 PM

    Argggghhh! What a fucking moron! Please someone explain to him the rules!

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #7 - June 26, 2010, 08:46 PM

    Come on, man. It's a one-on-one debate. Use the comments thread, if you feel the need to debunk debunker. Wink

    German ex-Muslim forumMy YouTubeList of Ex-Muslims
    Wikis: en de fr ar tr
    CEMB-Chat
    I'm on an indefinite break...
  • Re: Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #8 - June 26, 2010, 08:49 PM

    thanks, again, Aziz!

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #9 - June 26, 2010, 08:49 PM

    Argggghhh! What a fucking moron! Please someone explain to him the rules!


    When others were commenting on your chat everything was fine, when I commented suddenly you wanted control over comments.  No, fuck it, if you don't want a public debate do it on MSN and then post the log.

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #10 - June 26, 2010, 08:51 PM

    When others were commenting on your chat everything was fine, when I commented suddenly you wanted control over comments.  No, fuck it, if you don't want a public debate do it on MSN and then post the log.



    FUCK YOUR stupidity!


    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #11 - June 26, 2010, 09:00 PM

    Calrification:

    All the posts between me and Ration, were made when he posted in the Exclusive Rooms... Aziz now moved these to this comments thread.

    One more time, thank you, Aziz!

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #12 - June 26, 2010, 09:03 PM

    wait is that what happened? Or was I confusing the comments thread with the original thread? :blush:

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #13 - June 26, 2010, 09:04 PM

    One more time, thank you, Aziz!


    Yes, thankyou Aziz for helping him to single me out, thankyou for participating in victimisation of an individual.  Thanks a lot.  Let's ban jokes about Muhammad while we are in the process of censorship.

    Sorry, but you've pissed me off.

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #14 - June 26, 2010, 09:04 PM

    lol

    What's this got to do with censorship and making jokes about Muhammad???

    I should be the last person to be accused of advocating censorship.

    It's a one-on-one debate. Simple as that!

    German ex-Muslim forumMy YouTubeList of Ex-Muslims
    Wikis: en de fr ar tr
    CEMB-Chat
    I'm on an indefinite break...
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #15 - June 26, 2010, 09:06 PM

    btw Aziz,

    you did remove the posts from the original thread to this comments thread, right? I mean I wasn't doing all this protesting in this comments thread originally, right?

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #16 - June 26, 2010, 09:06 PM

    Yes

    German ex-Muslim forumMy YouTubeList of Ex-Muslims
    Wikis: en de fr ar tr
    CEMB-Chat
    I'm on an indefinite break...
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #17 - June 26, 2010, 09:07 PM

    Phew! I thought I was hallucinating!

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #18 - June 26, 2010, 09:26 PM

    Yes, thankyou Aziz for helping him to single me out, thankyou for participating in victimisation of an individual.  Thanks a lot.  Let's ban jokes about Muhammad while we are in the process of censorship.

    Sorry, but you've pissed me off.


    Montel, please.

    fuck you
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #19 - June 26, 2010, 09:32 PM

    Yes, thankyou Aziz for helping him to single me out, thankyou for participating in victimisation of an individual.  Thanks a lot.  Let's ban jokes about Muhammad while we are in the process of censorship.

    Sorry, but you've pissed me off.


    calm down dude. we've had one-on-one debates on here before, it's not a novel concept

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #20 - June 26, 2010, 09:47 PM

    What has pissed me off is that it was not posted as a one-on-one discussion, but then as soon as *I* comment on it, suddenly it should be a one-on-one.  The purpose of it being one on one was simply to stop ME from commenting on it.  That is victimisation and censorship.

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #21 - June 26, 2010, 09:51 PM

    Sorry dude. You guys apparently don't like each other. What's the point of starting arguments with him?

    German ex-Muslim forumMy YouTubeList of Ex-Muslims
    Wikis: en de fr ar tr
    CEMB-Chat
    I'm on an indefinite break...
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #22 - June 26, 2010, 09:53 PM

    Sorry dude. You guys apparently don't like each other. What's the point of starting arguments with him?


    I don't dislike him, he dislikes me.  If he wants to talk in private, fine, do it.  If he wants a one-on-one then post in there, I never check that forum.  But to post in a public forum and then to only ask for it to be moved because *I* comment on it is in my opinion unacceptable.  Being exposed to people you dislike is one of the facts of talking on public forums, he should get over it, and I am disappointed that his request to censor me was granted.

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #23 - June 26, 2010, 10:06 PM

    It's not a request for censorship. He wanted a one-on-one debate and so when you posted in the thread he requested it be moved to one-on-one. Now no-one besides IA and he (and staff if they feel it necessary) may comment in that thread, per the rules of that sub-forum.

    What's the big deal? I don't get why you are taking this personally.

    fuck you
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #24 - June 26, 2010, 10:57 PM

    What's the big deal? I don't get why you are taking this personally.

    I can see where TheRationalizer is coming from. I started the thread in the Religion and God sub-forum and I didn't intend it to be a one-on-one thing. He posted and then all out of the sudden Debunker got worked up and asked him to buzz off.

    Don't get me wrong, I think it was a good idea to move the thread to the relevant section but I have a feeling Debunker was not concerned about the rules as much as he disliked TR. 

  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #25 - June 26, 2010, 11:47 PM

    Okay, I guess I can understand that, but I don't see how Aziz is at fault.

    fuck you
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #26 - June 26, 2010, 11:54 PM

    Montel, Springer, please.


     Cool

    "A good man is so hard to find but a hard man is so good to find"
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #27 - June 26, 2010, 11:55 PM

    but I don't see how Aziz is at fault.

    Me neither.
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #28 - June 27, 2010, 01:33 AM

    The thread was called "Debunker and IA debate" - I was going to comment on it, but the title stopped me from doing so.  I guess DB called Rtzlr on it first, well its obvious he's got a bee in his bonnet about him for some reason or other.  

    Anyhow this doesnt change the fact that DB has got a major attitude problem with Rationlizer.  Cut it out DB!  I dont care if you have an issue with him, but I have never seen him be a fraction as rude to you as you are to him.  

    I really think you should apologise.

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Comments on Debunker and IA debate
     Reply #29 - June 27, 2010, 01:37 AM

    Hi there Islame!

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • 12 3 ... 11 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »