Dear Hassan doesn't it shows that Quran is really the book of God if you can't prove any scientific mistake in Quran. How could an illiterate man write the book without making any scientific mistake. How it is possible. Muslim apologists like zakir naik claim that there is no any scientific mistake in Quran and if knowledgeable people like you keep silent then it does show that their claim is right.
1: All of the miracle claims come into the following categories
A: The information was already known and plagiarised.
B: The words have been mistranslated deliberately to be favourable, and any conflicting verses ignored.
C: The claimant lies.
2: There are lots of places where the Quran seems to be echoing false beliefs of the time, people dismiss the simple explanations (Muhammad thought the Sun orbited the Earth) in favour of complex ones (God exists, God spoke to Muhammad, for some reason God told Muhammad the Sun orbits the Milky Way which takes 225 million years).
3: Muhammad certainly made scientific mistakes, but he spoke in a mystical way in which no absolute claim was made for or against anything.
13:2 - Allah it is Who raised up the heavens without visible supports
What does this say? To a Muslim it says "There are no supports holding up the heavens as the Jews believed" but to me it says "God DID raise up the heavens" which is factually as inaccurate as you can get, and also "without VISIBLE supports" - meaning that the supports are invisible.
If any objective person were to read the Quran and make notes along the way, once they reached the end and logically grouped their notes the answer would be clear to them. The Quran was written by the mind of a 7th century human who believed the Earth was the centre of the universe, and believed in local superstitions like people being able to perform magic.