It's not a surprise, it's probably because it reminds them of a religion that betrayed them.
For me, this is not the case.
My problem with Islam is completely ideological. If reducing this to "anger against Islam" or "just changing the flavour of hatred" will make some people feel better, let them do so. Nobody is obliged to to feel any respect to any aspect of Islam or Islamic culture, or pretend to do so, in order to appease some vague concept of "balance." Who knows, maybe I am a xenophobe too, even though I was born into Islam. After all, I have been accused of "bigotry" at least once in this forum. This just shows how far some people can get attached to their vision, and judge other people accordingly.
I am going to repeat, positive stereotypes are as wrong as negative stereotypes. What exactly is "imbalanced" about this statement? I hear such accusations every time there is a controversial subject, yet nobody bothers to refute the anti-Islamic arguments hanging in the air, and I am expected to convince myself that there is any intrinsic value to be found in Islam for the sake of what? Moderation? Moderation according to whom?
The pedophilia thread, for example. Some people, apparently, think that rejecting/rewording Mohammad's pedophilia makes us very "tolerant" and "moderate."
These people deserve the credit. Not Allah or even Islam.
I agree, though I think Hassan would give the credit to Islamic culture, not Allah.
There were brilliant people born into the Islamic world, yes, but why should Islam get any share of their individual glory? The credit always belongs to the individual. Would these people be less brilliant if they were born into another culture?
There is, for example, at least one Ottoman architect who designed majestic mosques. Wouldn't he design equally grand churches in he were born into the Christian Europe?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinan