Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Do humans have needed kno...
Today at 07:25 AM

New Britain
Today at 12:05 AM

Iran launches drones
April 13, 2024, 09:56 PM

عيد مبارك للجميع! ^_^
by akay
April 12, 2024, 04:01 PM

Eid-Al-Fitr
by akay
April 12, 2024, 12:06 PM

What's happened to the fo...
April 11, 2024, 01:00 AM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 01, 2024, 12:10 PM

Mock Them and Move on., ...
January 30, 2024, 10:44 AM

Pro Israel or Pro Palesti...
January 29, 2024, 01:53 PM

Pakistan: The Nation.....
January 28, 2024, 02:12 PM

Gaza assault
January 27, 2024, 01:08 PM

Nawal El Saadawi: Egypt's...
January 27, 2024, 12:24 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: The unholy alliance: Muslim countries join forces with America's religious right

 (Read 1540 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • The unholy alliance: Muslim countries join forces with America's religious right
     OP - May 26, 2016, 08:58 PM

    Quote
    Progressive social policies are increasingly under attack in international forums. Muslim countries are in the forefront of this campaign but they are also aided by rightwing elements in the United States and by countries where social conservatism has become part of nationalist discourse.

    Read the post on Brian Whitaker's blog: http://www.al-bab.com/blog/2016/may/unholy-alliance-hiv-islamic-cooperation.htm
  • The unholy alliance: Muslim countries join forces with America's religious right
     Reply #1 - May 26, 2016, 09:55 PM

    This has reached Canada too.  There were vigorous protests against Premier Kathleen Wynn's revised sex-ed curriculum from this 'unholy alliance'.

     One school, which has a high percentage of Muslim students, has bowed to parental pressure and is offering a sanitized version to Gr 1 students.

    http://www.metronews.ca/news/toronto/2016/05/13/santizied-sex-ed-program-offered-at-thorncliffe-school.html
    Quote
    (Clicky for piccy!)
    An alternative to Ontario’s updated health curriculum is being offered by the Toronto elementary school that found itself at the centre of the sex-education controversy — with Grade 1 students having the option to learn about “private parts” instead of proper names for genitalia.
    Thorncliffe Park Principal Jeff Crane said because a number of parents had concerns about their children being taught the words penis and vagina, the school decided to offer a class where teachers covered the key issue of inappropriate touching without being specific about body parts, a move meant to keep kids in school this week and at least learn some of the curriculum.
    About 60 per cent of the 300 students in that grade were taught the proper curriculum, the remaining 40 per cent the sanitized version.
    “We let parents know ahead of time when the health strands for human development were being taught and, for Grade 1, that there would be one lesson where there would be discussion of body parts … They were told if learning the names of genitalia was a concern, they could write me a letter requesting a religious accommodation,” said Crane, whose school is located in the riding represented by Premier Kathleen Wynne, who championed the updated health curriculum.
    Parents were told “the lesson would be exactly the same, but instead of using proper terms like penis and vagina, we would use the term ‘private parts.’ The key learning in that expectation is that this is a part of your body always covered with clothes, nobody touches it and you don’t show anybody. We were able to maintain the integrity of the expectation with a very simple accommodation.”
    Last September, Thorncliffe Park school was hit by protests — which saw hundreds of children pulled out of school because of the sex-ed curriculum — where parents set up their own classes in the adjacent park. Even weeks later, when that protest ended, enrolment remained lower than expected. But now, it has rebounded and sits at 1,310 students, down from the projected 1,350.

    .......
    However, veteran sexual health educator Lyba Spring noted the most common ages for sexual abuse is between 5 and 9 years old, and “parents should understand the importance of their children having dictionary words for their genitals . . . (the terms) are the building blocks for further sexual health education as they continue in their secular public school.”
    She warned of the long-term implications of the alternative lessons in Grade 1. “They are already subverting the curriculum … what happens especially in Grades 5 and 6, when they are talking about sexual intercourse … because they are talking about the prevention of sexually transmitted infections? What happens as they are talking about consent? I can just see parents’ minds working, and at every step of the way, they will try and subvert and disrespect the curriculum.

    “If schools ‘accommodate’ at this early stage in the game, they are setting themselves up for real battles later on, and the only ones who are going to suffer are the kids.”

    Now that it’s time to start talking about sex, many schools across the province have been sending home letters to parents to give notice of upcoming lessons. Boards say overall they haven’t been overwhelmed with requests for kids to be removed from class or otherwise accommodated and credited that with outreach efforts.

    That includes the province’s Catholic boards, where Grade 1s are taught the full human development curriculum, including references to genitalia.

  • The unholy alliance: Muslim countries join forces with America's religious right
     Reply #2 - May 26, 2016, 10:54 PM

    Imo denying kids proper sex ed is just setting them up for disaster in the future.  Unfortunately when many parents hear the term Sex Ed they think it means that schools are teaching children how to have intercourse. 

    Atheism is a non-prophet organization.

    The sleeper has awakened -  Dune

    Give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day Give him a religion, and he'll starve to death while praying for a fish!
  • The unholy alliance: Muslim countries join forces with America's religious right
     Reply #3 - May 27, 2016, 11:32 AM

    It seems that the religious still prefer other religions rather than atheism.

    They may not agree on the faith related questions (except the insistence on having an invisible magic friend), but they certainly agree, that atheists are a nasty lot.


    The funny part is, that it is quite clear, that teenage pregnancies and STDs are remarkably higher  in the areas where quality sex ed is not on the curriculum.


    (But keeping people uninformed and single minded, makes them easier to control)
  • The unholy alliance: Muslim countries join forces with America's religious right
     Reply #4 - May 28, 2016, 07:35 PM

    Further on the Ontario sex-ed curriculum, this editorial by Chris Selley makes the point that the Liberals had previously been uncompromising in their claims about what kids need to learn about sex...

    http://tinyurl.com/z98je9m

    There has been a certain amount of chortling from right-wingers about how the Liberals have sold out one cherished progressive ideal(ie. comprehensive sex education), in order to pursue another(ie. cultural accomadation). Something to that, I think sexual liberalism and multiculturalism have been on a collision course for a while now. Though it should be read into the record that the Liberals have their own history of Muslim-bashing, when the Tories proposed extending support for religious schools a couple of elections back.

    I think an equally relevant factor might be that the recalcitrant school is in Premier Wynne's riding, and Mulims tend to vote Liberal. In other words, this is one group the premier almost certainly doesn't want to piss off.

  • The unholy alliance: Muslim countries join forces with America's religious right
     Reply #5 - May 28, 2016, 08:32 PM

    Quote
    I think an equally relevant factor might be that the recalcitrant school is in Premier Wynne's riding, and Mulims tend to vote Liberal. In other words, this is one group the premier almost certainly doesn't want to piss off.


    I didn't realise that.
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »