Ban all items covering faces or none ?

Skip navigation

Sidebar -

↑ ↓

CEMB → Forum → Welcome to the forum → The Lounge → Ban all items covering faces or none ?

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Theme Changer

Site default theme Optional dark theme Basic wap2 interface

Topic: Ban all items covering faces or none ?

(Read 2179 times)

1« Previous thread | Next thread »
- serpentofeden
- Pub Regular
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
OP - May 26, 2015, 11:55 PM

discuss

http://i.imgur.com/TI5QkXh.jpg
- asbie
- Actually just a dude
- Poster of the Month
- Past, present, future...
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
Reply #1 - May 27, 2015, 12:19 AM

Ban cops, ANARCHEE!!!!1

Quote from: yeezevee on February 11, 2016, 02:05 PM
how fuck works without shit??

Let's Play Chess!

harakaat, friend, RIP
- Quod Sum Eris
- King of the
- Pub Regular
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
Reply #2 - May 27, 2015, 01:12 AM

Third one doesn't hide your identity.

`But I don't want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked.
`Oh, you can't help that,' said the Cat: `we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.'
`How do you know I'm mad?' said Alice.
`You must be,' said the Cat, `or you wouldn't have come here.'
- three
- Ex-Muslim
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
Reply #3 - May 27, 2015, 01:32 AM

I like Halloween.

Don't let Hitler have the street.
- Cornflower
- Ex-Muslim
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
Reply #4 - May 27, 2015, 06:22 AM

There's not much to discuss based on the picture alone.

"The healthiest people I know are those who are the first to label themselves fucked up." - three
- Absurdist
- Ex-Muslim
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
Reply #5 - May 27, 2015, 07:36 AM

I say let's get rid of the disease rather than just the symptom and ban the face.
- three
- Ex-Muslim
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
Reply #6 - May 28, 2015, 02:00 AM

I agree. Let's watch the cosmetics industry squirm.

Don't let Hitler have the street.
- osmanthus
- Cave dwelling
- Pub Regular
- Fingerer of piglets
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
Reply #7 - May 28, 2015, 06:22 AM

Quote from: serpentofeden on May 26, 2015, 11:55 PM
discuss

No.

Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West.
- cosmicdancer
- Pub Regular
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
Reply #8 - May 28, 2015, 08:24 AM

Quote from: osmanthus on May 28, 2015, 06:22 AM
No.

Oz

Long time no see mate.
- Skywalker
- Pub Regular
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
Reply #9 - May 28, 2015, 03:05 PM

Liberal democracy is very recent, if you consider it, and it would primarly impact freedom of expression and privacy laws when talking about bans against certain clothing. Several if not most western states had the death penalty for blasphemy during the middle of 18 hundreds. Death penalty for blasphemy in Sweden was lifted during 1860s.Denmark had the death penalty for homosexuality until 1866.The last to be executed for homosexuality in England was 1835, and the death penalty for homosexuality was repealed in 1866.And after the death penalty was removed, the penalty would be imprisonment and forced labour
- osmanthus
- Cave dwelling
- Pub Regular
- Fingerer of piglets
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
Reply #10 - May 30, 2015, 09:26 PM

Quote from: Hassan on May 28, 2015, 08:24 AM
Oz

Long time no see mate.

I haz been covering me internet face.

Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West.
- cosmicdancer
- Pub Regular
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
Reply #11 - May 30, 2015, 11:57 PM

Funny coz I've been (re) uncovering mine these days.

Anyway good to see you back
- someone1991
- Member
- offline
Ban all items covering faces or none ?
Reply #12 - June 01, 2015, 05:14 PM

Nah too much effort.
1« Previous thread | Next thread »