Completely logical conclusion, I'd say.
But the usual ethical problems arise. Does this "good living environment" that children should only be born into include a good emotional environment? Surely a child shouldn't be born to emotionally disturbed parents. Who gets to decide what a good emotional environment is? I doubt I'd pass the test.
Nope, I think I'm going to continue to argue that we'd be better off just letting the human race die out by not reproducing.
Sure, we'd miss out on the potential good times of being alive, but you'd never know what you'd missed out on, so you wouldn't care.
Firsly, I'm assuming that you probably want to quote like this [*quote=Name]msg[/quote] rather than [*quote][Name]msg[/quote](or just quote people directly)
Secondly, I already said that in my previous post that people should ensure that they are emotionally/psychologically prepared in addition to the environment factors. I do not believe the grey area to be as shady as you think, tho I understand your concern. There are lots of ways parents can get help raising children, and I also think, as naive as it my seem, that as long as there's a will there's a way; i.e. so long as they are willing to be parents, they are most likely going to be able to handle it. Evolution has given us parental instincts that may not always go hand-in-hand with our other drives, but instincts that are there to help ensure that we care about our children.
I do not fear death. I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it.
― Mark Twain(paraphrased)
I dislike the thought of an early death, I am curious about the world around me and enjoy living. However, I am also not paranoid about death, I do not believe there to be any eternal anguish hovering about death. That being said, I believe it is much better to live for a while than to have never lived at all(tho I dread the idea of eternal life for obvious reasons).
Topic: Human Extinction - A good thing?